More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($25K-$50K) voters
Last answered 5 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($25K-$50K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 3, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by ctvnews.ca
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, if insurance is required, then it needs to be regulated by the government whether state4 or federal. 6 years ago from a Green in North Palm Springs, CA
No, the government should not be directly involved in the insurance business; however, they should require insurance companies to have open books so consumers can better compare options. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Coronado, CA
Yes. The government should protect consumers from unreasonable premium increases and medical costs. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Hawthorne, CA
The state should have more than just one person monitoring and regulating that. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Carmichael, CA