More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($25K-$50K) voters
Last answered 5 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($25K-$50K) voters.
Yes, local governments should be allowed to seize land for pulic projects but not for private projects
No, as long as landowners are fairly compensated, local governments should be allowed to seize land for projects that benefit the community
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 29, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
8 years ago by opposingviews.com
8 years ago by thenation.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, local governments should be allowed to seize land for public projects when no other avenue is available. This seizure must not in any way benefit any private project. Additionally compensation for this land must be at minimum double the appraised... 8 years ago from a Republican in Albemarle, NC
Yes, if the landowners agree and are fairly compensated, then the government can seize land. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Boone, NC
Yes, and governments should have to buy, sell and own private proerty like its citizens. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Mount Holly, NC
I have never agreed with imminent domain policies. I have seen whole families who for generations have lived in the same houses be forced to move for so called progress. 8 years ago from a Republican in Bridgeton, NC
Each case is different and has to be looked out with input from Public and Private concerns. 8 years ago from a Republican in Clemmons, NC
Yes, the government should be able to seize public property when national security is a t risk. IE land around possible terrorist targets. However there must be fare reimbursement as well as court approval. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Arden, NC