More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income (over $200K) voters
Last answered 5 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income (over $200K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 29, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
8 years ago by telegraph.co.uk
8 years ago by thejournal.ie
8 years ago by equalityontrial.com
8 years ago by warwickdailynews.com.au
8 years ago by freep.com
8 years ago by cnn.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Only in an instance where they are pleading guilty. Or they will waive their right to appeal. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Jamestown, NC
Yes, because some matters are simple deliberation of law, and not necessarily requiring the protection a jury of peers provides. An informed consent to release that right is good. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Charlotte, NC
People have the right to waive their rights, even if I personally believe that rights not exercised are inevitably lost. 8 years ago from a Libertarian in Sanford, NC
Yes, if they are fully aware of this decision and are willing to waive this right, if not then trial by jury is the default method. 8 years ago from a Democrat in Charlotte, NC