The Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act would allow California to borrow $11.1B (27% towards water storage, 20% towards sustainability, 15% towards ecosystem and watershed restoration, 11% towards water recycling and treatment facilities, 13% towards water management, 9% towards groundwater protection and cleanup, and 4% towards drought relief and safe drinking water). The bond would be funded by California taxpayers through the state's general fund.
63% Yes |
37% No |
55% Yes |
24% No |
8% Yes, California's water system is in desperate need of any overhaul |
8% No, we need to balance our budget first |
3% No, the costs of overhauling California's water system should be paid for by wealthy farmers and agricultural business |
|
2% No, this proposition does not protect California's Delta region |
See how support for each position on “California Water Act” has changed over time for 150k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “California Water Act” has changed over time for 150k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Active 6 days agoCountries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
