More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Associate's Degree voters
Last answered 6 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Associate's Degree voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 9, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Education data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
More stances on this issue
Yes, but spend the money on more storage. Not just tunnels to steal it from the North. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Red Bluff, CA
That's a broad statement or request without any information. This is typical of how California's politicians try and get measures passed so that certain special interest groups benefit and the rest get screwed holding the bill. Another big NO!... 9 years ago from a Republican in Alameda, CA
Possibly, but I don't know enough about the issue to decide right now. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Chula Vista, CA
Only if the solar arch system is added to eliminate losses due to evaporation while in transit and to generate power to drive the pumps needed. 9 years ago from a Republican in Huntington Beach, CA
Add new technology to preserve water as well as to transport it like the solar arch system would do while generating the power to actually transport water to point of use. 9 years ago from a Republican in Huntington Beach, CA
I don't think anyone can really answer to the state of our water system unless they work there. They have some of the highest paid employees I know of in the public sector. 9 years ago from a Republican in Vista, CA
Cancel the bullet train and spend the money on the water system. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Yorba Linda, CA
We desperately need water in the San Joaquin Valley. We're an agricultural community. We are the bread basket for the nation. We need water to grow the crops, to feed the rest of the country. 9 years ago from a Republican in Goshen, CA
No, borrow less money for an extended period of time to gradually change the state's water system OR don't borrow any money and focus our tax dollars on water system change. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Coronado, CA
Water should be limited, no more sweeping with a hose, no more sprinkler systems. We don't have the water we are using now. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Signal Hill, CA
So long as the stated debt ratio remains healthy. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Brea, CA
Only if it is allowed to be paid off earlier when there is a budget surplus. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Coronado, CA
Put it to a bond measure, referendum. 9 years ago from a Republican in Signal Hill, CA
Yea as long as it removed fluoride from our water completely. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Valencia, CA
As long as it is regulated and the money actually goes for that purpose. 9 years ago from a Republican in El Cajon, CA