More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (Single Moms) voters
Last answered 8 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (Single Moms) voters.
No, the costs of overhauling California's water system should be paid for by wealthy farmers and agricultural business
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 9, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
More stances on this issue
I am not sure. I live in California; it needs a LOT of things during this Recession. I would like clean water but is it MORE important than Jobs or housing or medical??? I don't know. 9 years ago from a Green in Modesto, CA
Yes, But cut off Southern California from Northern Water. Make Southern California build Desalinization plants for water. They have the money. Make the entertainment business pay for it. 9 years ago from a Republican in Mountain View, CA
Possibly, but I don't know enough about the issue to decide right now. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Chula Vista, CA
CA bureaucrats should never be given access to more borrowed money for them to regulate right out of existence and left with nothing but an additional $25B Debt. 9 years ago from a Republican in Compton, CA
Overhaul system but do not borrow to do it, pay for it out current budget. 9 years ago from a Republican in Modesto, CA
Unfortunately the last water bond money has been largely wasted on perks like artwork. I have little confidence in the honesty of those spending the bond money to actually fix our water system. Wish I had an answer. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Pasadena, CA
The State's water system should be overhauled, but the funds should come from spending cuts. 9 years ago from a Republican in Foresthill, CA
Water should be limited, no more sweeping with a hose, no more sprinkler systems. We don't have the water we are using now. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Signal Hill, CA
Only if it will affect public health. Who is it going to be borrowed from, though?. 9 years ago from a Socialist in Whittier, CA
Yes, but only after a scientific approach that maximizes use and not a political decision is approved. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Pasadena, CA
Only if it doesn't increase what we owe in the long term. 9 years ago from a Republican in Harbor City, CA
Put it to a bond measure, referendum. 9 years ago from a Republican in Signal Hill, CA
California should begin funding research and development of methods for converting sea water to drinking water. 9 years ago from a Republican in Mission Viejo, CA
California should revise its approach to water issues to restrict growth, conserve, and protect natural waterways, aquatic species, and wetlands. 9 years ago from a Green in Sebastopol, CA
Borrowing would put the state further in debt. It would be best to first divert funds from less critical services to use for the overhauling the water system. 9 years ago from a Republican in Cutten, CA
We've over borrowed. We need to change the tax base with income and sales tax. Reduce bot, , bring business back to the state which will provide the necessary funds for us to do a lot of thing we need. 9 years ago from a Republican in Pasadena, CA