More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Associate's Degree voters
Last answered 5 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Associate's Degree voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 9, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Education data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
More stances on this issue
No, and since the government is supposed operate efficiently based on existing fees that are justified from a zero based budget, there should not be such a gap that would allow for 3% to be set aside for a rainy day. 7 years ago from a Republican in Goleta, CA
They should, after they rescind the temporary sales tax increase. There is no surplus until they no those results. 7 years ago from a Republican in Union City, CA
Who's rainy day? The politicians? Nancy Pelosi's (she is already a big tax waster) The environmental groups? Another big NO! Thanks for giving us a heads up so that we can inform our friends to start an opposition group. 7 years ago from a Republican in Alameda, CA
No, it will always be plundered. 7 years ago from a Republican in San Diego, CA
Yes, increase our savings, and cut spending. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Fresno, CA
Yes, but cut spending and invest into the state infrastructure. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Toluca Lake, CA