More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Some College voters
Last answered 2 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Some College voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 9, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Education data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
Learn more about Rainy Day Fund Increase
The California Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund Act would increase the state’s savings from 5% to 10% by setting aside 3% of state revenues. Exceptions would include years when revenues drop below the previous years budget and increasing the amount of savings during years of budget surplus. See recent Rainy Day Fund Increase news
More stances on this issue
Who's rainy day? The politicians? Nancy Pelosi's (she is already a big tax waster) The environmental groups? Another big NO! Thanks for giving us a heads up so that we can inform our friends to start an opposition group. 5 years ago from a Republican in Alameda, CA
Put money into maintaining and fireproofing wild areas so we don't need contingency funds for fire fighting. 5 years ago from a Republican in Edison, CA
Yes, increase our savings, and cut spending. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Fresno, CA
Yes, provided there is a cap on the maximum amount in the fund. The state government cannot borrow like the feds. This will provide a cushion in an economic downturn while cuts are enacted. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Kenwood, CA
I am to uninformed to have an opinion. 5 years ago from a Democrat in El Cerrito, CA
Cut spending so that current revenues can accommodate a 1.5% set aside to a rainy day fund. 5 years ago from a Republican in Northridge, CA
All surplus should be returned to taxpayers, there should be no surplus. 5 years ago from a Republican in Foresthill, CA
Return the money to the people. 5 years ago from a Libertarian in Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Yes, if we can afford to do so while maintaining essential services. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Spreckels, CA
Yes, and cut spending at the same time. Stop providing medical insurance to people who were elected to an office and are no longer serving. 5 years ago from a Republican in Coyote, CA
Lower taxes and don't unbalance the budget. 5 years ago from a Republican in Harbor City, CA
No, any surplus should be returned to the taxpayer. History shows that legislators have always managed to deplete any surplus or savings in tax monies for pet projects that do not benefit the people of the state. 5 years ago from a Republican in Rohnert Park, CA
California should invest in a Green New Deal that would create jobs, solve environmental problems, improve funding for education, boost tax revenues with increased income sales tax with which we could gradually build up a reasonable reserve. 5 years ago from a Green in Sebastopol, CA