More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (Single) voters
Last answered 4 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (Single) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 9, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
More stances on this issue
Who's rainy day? The politicians? Nancy Pelosi's (she is already a big tax waster) The environmental groups? Another big NO! Thanks for giving us a heads up so that we can inform our friends to start an opposition group. 6 years ago from a Republican in Alameda, CA
No, it will always be plundered. 6 years ago from a Republican in San Diego, CA
No, there is too much waste that needs to be addressed. This money will be abused. 6 years ago from a Republican in Culver City, CA
I have no knowledge regarding this issue. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Brisbane, CA
Yes, provided there is a cap on the maximum amount in the fund. The state government cannot borrow like the feds. This will provide a cushion in an economic downturn while cuts are enacted. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Kenwood, CA
No, spending should be directed to public schools. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Sacramento, CA
All surplus should be returned to taxpayers, there should be no surplus. 7 years ago from a Republican in Foresthill, CA
No opinion unless they default on loans to the federal government. 7 years ago from a Republican in Brisbane, CA
No, invest money into public education instead. 7 years ago from a Socialist in Tracy, CA
No, any surplus should be returned to the taxpayer. History shows that legislators have always managed to deplete any surplus or savings in tax monies for pet projects that do not benefit the people of the state. 7 years ago from a Republican in Rohnert Park, CA