More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (Single Moms) voters
Last answered 4 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (Single Moms) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 9, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
Learn more about Rainy Day Fund Increase
The California Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund Act would increase the state’s savings from 5% to 10% by setting aside 3% of state revenues. Exceptions would include years when revenues drop below the previous years budget and increasing the amount of savings during years of budget surplus. See recent Rainy Day Fund Increase news
More stances on this issue
At one time the state of California was the 7th largest economy in the World, The "Demoncrats" have been in total power for over 75 years and are 90% responsible for the State now being broke!! No different than DC, they will always spend more... 5 years ago from a Republican in Pasadena, CA
WHY? So our Pollutiticians can pocket MORE tax money..I am totally against supporting more freeloading LAWYERS. They are NO different than Welfare recipients, except lawyers use taxpayers money to ADD to what they are already making... 5 years ago from a Republican in Garden Grove, CA
No. We need money set aside but our state legislatures will find a way to invent an emergency and spend the money on it. 5 years ago from a Republican in Pasadena, CA
This is a great idea (in theory). However, in practice, the government can never hope to have a surplus (except by accident), because legislators are always looking to spend any available money. In years of plenty, they will go ahead and spend (knowing... 5 years ago from a Republican in Pasadena, CA
I am to uninformed to have an opinion. 5 years ago from a Democrat in El Cerrito, CA
Yes, but cut spending and invest into the state infrastructure. 5 years ago from a Libertarian in Toluca Lake, CA
All surplus should be returned to taxpayers, there should be no surplus. 5 years ago from a Republican in Foresthill, CA
How about less corruption. 5 years ago from a Libertarian in Pasadena, CA
Lower taxes and don't unbalance the budget. 5 years ago from a Republican in Harbor City, CA
Establish strict limits on new spending -- link legislative salaries to spending control by legislature. 5 years ago from a Republican in Mission Viejo, CA
This legislature will only throw away the money. They are fiscally irresponsible. 5 years ago from a Republican in Pasadena, CA
California should invest in a Green New Deal that would create jobs, solve environmental problems, improve funding for education, boost tax revenues with increased income sales tax with which we could gradually build up a reasonable reserve. 5 years ago from a Green in Sebastopol, CA