More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Doctorate Degree voters
Last answered 2 months ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Doctorate Degree voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Oct 21, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- South Carolina
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
6 years ago by motherjones.com
6 years ago by washingtonpost.com
6 years ago by thinkprogress.org
6 years ago by billmoyers.com
7 years ago by washingtonpost.com
7 years ago by occupydemocrats.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, and the demographics of each district should be taken into account by those WHO KNOW the makeup of each county and district. 7 years ago from a Green in Ivy, VA
Gerrymandering should be eliminated. Set the districts once and for all and let them be. If you need to redraw the playing field in order to win you should not be playing the game. 7 years ago from a Republican in Hanover, NH
No, gerrymandering should be phased out entirely. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Baton Rouge, LA
It should be handled by an independent, non-partisan commission that uses a computer program to draw the lines, with real people correcting for unintentional negative results. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Chestnut Hill, MA