More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Less than High School voters
Last answered 4 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Less than High School voters.
No, in exchange for funding Obamacare and raising the debt limit, Mitch McConnell received a $2 Billion kickback for his state
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Oct 16, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Education data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
McConnell looked to the interests in his state when there was no chance of defunding Obama care. 6 years ago from a Republican in Georgetown, KY
No opinion at the moment. 7 years ago from a Republican in Central City, KY
Not a kickback - funding was approved many legislative sessions ago. 7 years ago from a Republican in Louisville, KY
The $3B has already been approved to complete the project. It should not require an increase of the amount which has already been approved. This is a project that seems as though it benefits many states and a large part of the US. It is not just a... 7 years ago from a Republican in Glasgow, KY
No , and mcconnell needs to return the $2 billion. 7 years ago from a Republican in Winchester, KY
People love sausage but they never want to tour a sausage factory. Politics is a contact sport. 7 years ago from a Republican in Portland, OR
Yes, this is exactly the sort of large, economically critical infrastructure development that the Federal government should be involved in. 7 years ago from a Democrat in East Grand Forks, MN
NO earmarks!. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Houston, TX
This dam is important to KY but now was not the time to be increasing funding. 7 years ago from a Republican in Horse Branch, KY
An increase from 775 billion to 3 billion is too much. If the dam is necessary, take steps to fund it a little cheaper. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Littleton, CO
These types of things should never be allowed - pass clean bills!. 7 years ago from a Green in Chicago, IL