+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.9m America voters.

44%
Yes
56%
No
32%
Yes
46%
No
10%
Yes, but only as a coordinated effort by the United Nations
5%
No, conduct targeted airstrikes instead
1%
Yes, send at least 10,000 ground troops
3%
No, we should stay out of this conflict
1%
Yes, send a few hundred ground troops
2%
No, not until they attack us on U.S. soil
0%
No, send special operation forces instead

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.9m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.9m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @angelpingzfrom Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

If it affects USA then yes. If not who really cares what they do in their lands! If America is using land over there for military exercises then we should stop! Let them fight their own battles. If they kill each other why would we bother, they do this to themselves! Our blood and treasure stays here to defend Americans! Would you give an inbred/brainwashed race a gun to kill you? That is what is/has been done!

 @58Z94XRfrom Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

this should be a "dark" war, and full out no holds barred, CIA, special forces, etc...

 @7YNGP9T from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

No, we should stay out of this conflict but at the very least conduct targeted airstrikes if necessary.

 @ISIDEWITHanswered…4yrs4Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

No, conduct targeted airstrikes instead with other countries under the coordination of the United Nations