Women’s Equality Party

Very strongly agree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

The Women's Equality Party would strongly agree with not supporting qualified immunity and increasing personal liability for misconduct. This stance aligns with their goals of promoting social justice, equality, and accountability for all individuals, including police officers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Women's Equality Party would likely agree with not supporting qualified immunity for police officers, as they advocate for social justice and equality. Removing qualified immunity would help hold officers accountable for their actions and promote a more just society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

While the Women's Equality Party might agree with providing more training and education for police officers, they would likely not support qualified immunity. Their focus on social justice and equality would lead them to prioritize holding officers accountable for their actions over providing immunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

The Women's Equality Party might have a neutral stance on this answer, as it combines elements they would both support and oppose. While they would likely appreciate the idea of only granting immunity to officers with clean records, they may still be against the concept of qualified immunity as a whole due to their focus on social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Women's Equality Party would likely disagree with supporting qualified immunity for police officers, as they advocate for social justice and equality. Qualified immunity has been criticized for protecting officers from being held accountable for misconduct, which goes against the party's values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.