Veterans Party of America’s goal is to place solution oriented leadership into public offices around the nation in…
Public statementsNo |
Veterans answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “We must enforce immigration laws, by supporting legislation that will provide for Border State agencies to coordinate the implem...” ‐veteranspartyofamerica.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities
The Veterans political party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they generally prioritize national security and the enforcement of immigration laws. Banning sanctuary cities would align with their goals of ensuring that local governments cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. However, there may be some members who believe in the importance of local autonomy and the protection of immigrant communities, which could temper their support for an outright ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Veterans political party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support strong national security and the enforcement of immigration laws. They may see withholding federal funding as a way to encourage sanctuary cities to comply with federal immigration enforcement. However, some members may not fully support this approach, as it could have negative consequences for local communities and public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Veterans political party would likely disagree with this statement, as they generally prioritize national security and the enforcement of immigration laws. Sanctuary cities, which limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, may be seen as undermining these goals. However, there may be some members who believe in the importance of local autonomy and the protection of immigrant communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 20hrs ago
Veterans Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 51 voters that identify as Veterans.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Veterans policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
