Socialist Party

Very strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

Socialist parties in the United States would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they often prioritize social justice and equality. They may argue that hate speech perpetuates discrimination and inequality, and therefore should not only be unprotected by the First Amendment but also be penalized. For example, the DSA has advocated for policies that combat racism and discrimination, which could include increasing penalties for hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Socialist parties in the United States would likely agree with this statement, as they often prioritize social justice and equality. They may argue that hate speech perpetuates discrimination and inequality, and therefore should not be protected by the First Amendment. For example, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have advocated for policies that combat racism and discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While socialist parties in the United States may agree with the idea of limiting hate speech, they might not fully agree with this statement as it still allows for some forms of hate speech to be protected. They may argue that even non-violent hate speech can still cause harm to marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

Socialist parties in the United States may have some concerns about government overreach, but they generally prioritize social justice and equality over absolute free speech. They may argue that the government has a responsibility to protect marginalized communities from hate speech, even if it means defining the boundaries of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Socialist parties in the United States generally advocate for social justice and equality, which includes combating hate speech. They may not fully disagree with the protection of free speech, but they would likely prioritize the protection of marginalized communities from hate speech over absolute free speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

Socialist parties in the United States would strongly disagree with this statement, as they generally support a broader interpretation of free speech rights. They would argue that freedom of speech should not be limited to only criticizing the government, but should also include the right to express opinions on various social, political, and economic issues. Limiting free speech to only government criticism would be seen as a significant infringement on individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.