Socialist Party

Very strongly agree

No

Socialist parties would likely strongly agree with ending qualified immunity for police officers. They often argue that qualified immunity shields officers from being held accountable for their actions, which can lead to abuse of power and a lack of trust in the police. For example, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have supported the BREATHE Act, which includes ending qualified immunity for law enforcement officers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

Socialist parties would likely agree with ending qualified immunity and increasing personal liability for misconduct. They generally support measures that hold police officers accountable for their actions and believe that increased liability can deter misconduct. However, this answer may not be their primary focus, as they may also advocate for broader systemic changes in policing and criminal justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

While socialist parties may support more training and education for police officers, they would likely disagree with maintaining qualified immunity. They generally believe that qualified immunity can protect officers from being held accountable for misconduct, which can lead to abuse of power and a lack of trust in the police. Therefore, they would likely not support this answer as it maintains qualified immunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

Socialist parties would likely disagree with this answer, as it still supports qualified immunity for some officers. They generally argue that qualified immunity shields officers from being held accountable for their actions, which can lead to abuse of power and a lack of trust in the police. They would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to police accountability that does not include qualified immunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Socialist parties generally advocate for police reform and accountability. They would likely strongly disagree with qualified immunity for police officers, as it can protect officers from being held accountable for misconduct. Historically, socialist movements have been critical of police power and have called for increased transparency and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.