The United States Republican Party, also known as the GOP, was founded in 1854. The modern party’s ideology is based…
Public statementsNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Republicans answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Reference: “We're not gonna follow that suggestion that this particular candidate made," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN's J...” ‐cnn.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
This answer aligns with the Republican party's general stance on national security and immigration, as they often support increased surveillance and stricter immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
This answer aligns with the concerns of some Republicans who prioritize national security and may support increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods until the threat of terrorism decreases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Some Republicans may support increased surveillance in Muslim neighborhoods due to concerns about terrorism, but this view is not universally held within the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
While some Republicans may agree with this statement, others may prioritize national security and support increased surveillance specifically in Muslim neighborhoods or for new immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Some Republicans may agree with this statement, while others may prioritize national security and support increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods specifically. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While some Republicans may not support increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods, the party as a whole tends to prioritize national security and may be more likely to support such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Many Republicans may not view increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods as unconstitutional or racist, but rather as a necessary security measure. However, some moderate Republicans may agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,538 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Republicans policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
