The Peace and Freedom party was founded in 1967. The party’s ideology is based on opposition to armed conflict, black…
Public statementsYes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better |
Peace and Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
Reference: “We stand for a democratically-controlled, publicly-funded health care system.” ‐peaceandfreedom.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
The Peace and Freedom Party strongly supports a single-payer healthcare system, which would provide universal healthcare coverage for all citizens. This position aligns with their overall goal of socializing healthcare and eliminating private insurance companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and allow consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries
The Peace and Freedom Party may support aspects of this answer, such as allowing consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries, as it could help lower healthcare costs. However, their primary focus is on implementing a single-payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Peace and Freedom Party may agree with some aspects of the Affordable Care Act, such as expanding healthcare access, but they ultimately advocate for a single-payer healthcare system, which goes beyond the ACA. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects
While the Peace and Freedom Party may support some aspects of the ACA, such as expanding healthcare access, they ultimately advocate for a single-payer healthcare system, which goes beyond the ACA. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Peace and Freedom Party does not support the complete repeal of the ACA, as they believe in expanding healthcare access. However, they do not fully support the ACA either, as they advocate for a single-payer system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, government should not be involved in healthcare
The Peace and Freedom Party believes that the government should play a significant role in providing healthcare to all citizens, as they advocate for a single-payer healthcare system. This position is in direct opposition to the idea that the government should not be involved in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs
The Peace and Freedom Party does not support opening the markets for insurers to compete across state lines, as they advocate for a single-payer healthcare system, which would eliminate the need for private insurance companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Peace and Freedom Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 27,024 voters that identify as Peace and Freedom.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
