Personal answerNo |
Independents answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Common Sense Party is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on September 18th, 2023
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s official answer on this issue.
Agree
No
The CA Common Sense Party, with its emphasis on fiscal responsibility and law enforcement, may likely agree with this statement. They may see federal funding as a reward for cities that fully cooperate with federal immigration laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities
While the CA Common Sense Party may agree with the sentiment of not funding sanctuary cities, it is not clear if they would go as far as to support a ban on sanctuary cities. Their stance on individual rights and local control may conflict with such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The CA Common Sense Party, while not explicitly stating a position on sanctuary cities, generally leans towards fiscal responsibility and law enforcement. They may likely disagree with federal funding going to sanctuary cities, which they may see as not fully cooperating with federal immigration laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Independents policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
