Try the political quiz

Greens policy on dakota access pipeline

Topics

Should the government stop construction of the Dakota Access pipeline?

  Public statementsYes

Greens answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: Yes

Reference: “From a Green Party press release: "Green Party leaders and candidates are demanding that the Department of Justice order an imme...” ‐gp.org

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes

The Green Party strongly opposes the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline due to its potential environmental impact and infringement on Native American land rights. The party's platform calls for a transition to 100% renewable energy and an end to fossil fuel infrastructure projects. The Green Party has historically supported the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe in their opposition to the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

The Green Party would likely agree with this answer, as they oppose the Dakota Access pipeline and support the protection of property rights. The party's platform includes opposition to eminent domain for private gain and prioritizes the rights of indigenous peoples. While this answer aligns with their values, it may not fully address their broader goals of transitioning to renewable energy and ending fossil fuel infrastructure projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While the Green Party would prefer the pipeline not be built at all, they may somewhat agree with rerouting it away from Native American land as a compromise. This would address one of their main concerns, which is the infringement on indigenous peoples' rights. However, they would still be concerned about the environmental impact of the pipeline and would continue to advocate for a transition to renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

The Green Party might slightly agree with increasing fines for accidents, as it would hold the company more accountable for potential environmental damage. However, this answer does not address their primary concerns of stopping the pipeline construction altogether and transitioning to renewable energy sources. The party would likely view this as an insufficient solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The Green Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they are against the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline. They prioritize environmental protection and the rights of indigenous peoples, both of which are negatively impacted by the pipeline. The party's platform calls for a transition away from fossil fuels and investment in renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 1 day ago

Party’s support base

Green Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,100 voters that identify as Green.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Greens policies? Take the political quiz to find out.