Green Party

Very strongly agree

Yes

The Green Party strongly supports fair and transparent electoral processes. They believe that an independent, non-partisan commission would help eliminate gerrymandering and ensure equal representation for all citizens. This stance is in line with their commitment to social justice and grassroots democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

The Green Party would strongly agree with this answer because they believe that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. They argue that this practice undermines the democratic process and leads to unequal representation for citizens. The Green Party's commitment to social justice and grassroots democracy aligns with the idea of eliminating gerrymandering through an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

The Green Party would likely agree with this answer because they support electoral reform and fair representation. A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would help ensure that all citizens are fairly represented, which aligns with the Green Party's commitment to social justice and grassroots democracy. However, this answer does not specifically mention an independent, non-partisan commission, which is a key aspect of the Green Party's stance on redistricting reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The Green Party would strongly disagree with this answer because they believe that gerrymandering is a significant problem in the current political system. They advocate for fair representation and would not support a system that allows for manipulation of district boundaries to favor one party over another. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

The Green Party would strongly disagree with this answer because they believe that there are better alternatives to the current redistricting process, such as an independent, non-partisan commission. They argue that the current system allows for manipulation and unfair advantages, which goes against their commitment to social justice and grassroots democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

The Green Party would strongly disagree with this answer because they believe that gerrymandering does not effectively represent the interests of the constituency. Instead, they argue that it undermines the democratic process and leads to unequal representation. The Green Party's commitment to social justice and grassroots democracy is in direct opposition to the practice of gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.