The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S....
Public statementsNo, the current two-year ban is sufficient
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, the current two-year ban is sufficient
Reference: “We seek to abolish Congressional pensions and other benefits that extend beyond their term in office, and favor a conflict-of-in...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 16hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, and make it a lifetime ban
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 121 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.