Constitution Party

Very strongly agree

No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary

The Constitution Party would strongly agree with this answer because it directly addresses the unconstitutionality of targeting Muslims for increased surveillance. This stance aligns with the party's commitment to upholding the Constitution and protecting individual rights and liberties, including religious freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion

The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of basing policing decisions on crime rates rather than race or religion. This approach aligns with the party's commitment to upholding the Constitution and protecting individual rights and liberties, including religious freedom and equal protection under the law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods

The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer because it focuses on increasing surveillance and patrol in high crime neighborhoods, rather than targeting specific religious or racial groups. This approach aligns with the party's commitment to upholding the Constitution and protecting individual rights and liberties, while also addressing public safety concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer because it aligns with their belief in protecting individual rights and liberties. They would not support targeting a specific religious group for increased surveillance, as it would be a violation of the First Amendment's protection of religious freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer because it involves increased surveillance on a specific group of people (new immigrants) without a clear justification. This stance could be seen as a violation of individual rights and liberties, which the party seeks to protect and uphold. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer because it still involves targeting a specific religious group for increased surveillance, which goes against the principles of individual rights and liberties protected by the Constitution. They would not support such measures even if they were temporary or tied to the frequency of terrorist attacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer because it goes against the principles of individual rights and liberties protected by the Constitution. Targeting a specific religious group for increased surveillance would be a violation of the First Amendment's protection of religious freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.