Try the political quiz

Constitutionalists policy on gun liability

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

  ChatGPTNo

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer, as they support the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. They would likely argue that holding manufacturers and dealers responsible for the actions of individuals misusing firearms is unfair and infringes on their rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

The Constitution Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would likely support holding businesses accountable for negligence. However, they would still prioritize the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses, so their agreement might not be as strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While the Constitution Party supports the right to sue, they would likely disagree with this answer due to their support for the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. They might argue that allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could lead to frivolous lawsuits and infringe on the rights of these businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they support the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. They would likely argue that holding dealers responsible for the actions of individuals misusing firearms is unfair and infringes on their rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Constitution Party generally supports the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. They would likely disagree with allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it could infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they support the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. They would likely argue that the primary use of firearms is not for illegal activity, and holding manufacturers and dealers responsible for the actions of individuals misusing firearms is unfair. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 1 day ago

Party’s support base

Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Most Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 7,987 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.