The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution,…
Public statementsYes |
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “The Constitution Party seeks the restoration of an electoral process which is controlled at the state and local level and is bey...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
The Constitution Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in fair representation and limiting the power of the government. Gerrymandering is a clear example of the party in power manipulating the system for their advantage, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Constitution Party would likely support an independent, non-partisan commission for redrawing Congressional districts, as it aligns with their principles of limited government and fair representation. However, this may not be their primary focus or strongest stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
The Constitution Party may support a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system as an alternative to gerrymandering, as it promotes fair representation. However, this may not be their primary focus or strongest stance, and they may have concerns about the implementation of such a system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support limited government intervention and fair representation. Allowing partisan control over redistricting could lead to gerrymandering and unfair advantages for the party in power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
The Constitution Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe in finding solutions that promote fair representation and limit government power. They would likely argue that there are better alternatives, such as independent commissions or multi-member districts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
The Constitution Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe in fair representation and limiting government power. Gerrymandering is a clear example of the party in power manipulating the system for their advantage, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 284 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
