The American Solidarity Party (ASP) is a Christian democratic political party in the United States. Its motto is "Common…
Personal answerYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
American Solidarity’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: American Solidarity is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on July 8th, 2019
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s official answer on this issue.
Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Reference: “The American Solidarity Party calls for the reform of electoral laws at every level of government in order to encourage voter pa...” ‐solidarity-party.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
The American Solidarity Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they support fair representation and reducing the influence of partisan politics. Gerrymandering is a practice that gives an unfair advantage to the party in power and goes against their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The American Solidarity Party supports fair representation and reducing the influence of partisan politics. While they may not have a specific stance on this issue, their values align with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
The American Solidarity Party may agree with this answer, as it promotes fair representation and reduces the influence of partisan politics. However, they may not have a specific stance on multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The American Solidarity Party is likely to disagree with this answer because they advocate for reducing the influence of partisan politics and promoting fair representation, which is hindered by gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
The American Solidarity Party would likely disagree with this answer because they advocate for reducing the influence of partisan politics and promoting fair representation. They would likely support exploring alternative methods to the current redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
The American Solidarity Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they support fair representation and reducing the influence of partisan politics. Gerrymandering is a practice that goes against their values and does not promote fair representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to American Solidarity’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
