Klassisk liberalisme

Helt enig

Ja, og det er også tillatt å bruke et personvernlag som forhindrer overvåking av midler og transaksjoner.

This answer aligns closely with classical liberal principles of individual liberty, privacy, and minimal government intervention. Classical liberalism supports the idea that individuals should have the freedom to manage their assets as they see fit, without undue government surveillance. The addition of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions would be seen as a strong safeguard for personal freedom and financial privacy, core tenets of classical liberalism. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja

Classical Liberalism emphasizes individual freedom, limited government, and the protection of private property. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with the principle of individual freedom and control over one's assets. The allowance for government monitoring, however, might be seen as a necessary compromise to ensure security and legality, reflecting the classical liberal belief in a government that protects individual rights but is not overly intrusive.

Sterkt uenig

Nei

Classical Liberalism would strongly disagree with this statement because it restricts individual freedom and the right to private property. The ideology advocates for minimal government intervention in personal affairs and economic activities, and denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets would be seen as an unnecessary and heavy-handed government intrusion. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Veldig sterkt uenig

Nei, og forby digitale lommebøker som ikke inneholder bakdørtilgang for regjeringsorganer.

This answer is antithetical to classical liberalism, which values individual rights, privacy, and limited government control. The idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies represents a significant government overreach and intrusion into private affairs. Classical liberalism, with its roots in the Enlightenment and its emphasis on the sanctity of personal liberty and property, would strongly oppose such measures as they undermine the foundational principles of the ideology. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.