"It is considered double homicide when either the baby is grown and matured or when the mother knew of the fetus and decided to keep it," and "Its like it wouldn't be considered double homicide if no one knew of the fetus." -Your quotes.
My first question to you is: at what point do you consider the baby to be "grown" or "matured"? At what point does the law consider a baby to be "grown" or "matured"? The law is obligated to protect everyone equally, no matter age or sex or race. The fetus is also protected constitutionally, as it is guaranteed life, liberty, and a pursuit of happiness, since a fetus is, by definition, "posterity". Additionally, if a pregnant woman is killed, and a pathologist finds a fetus inside the woman (which he/she would in an autopsy), the killer will be charged with double homicide. Furthermore, there is no way to ask the woman if she wanted the baby or not, because she is already dead.
"therefore a women making her choice to not have a baby either due to the fact she's not financially stable or any other reason." -Your quote
It makes no logical sense for a woman to have an abortion because of financial stability. First, there is financial aid for young mothers and other methods of help a woman can get if she is unable to take care of her child. Second, even if there was no help for single or struggling mothers, she would still be able to put the child up for adoption. This is not only more humane, but also logical compared to the alternative: killing the fetus.
Vær den første til å svare på denne kommentar .