Statistik

Setuju

Ya

Statism, which emphasizes the role of the state in governing and prioritizing the nation's sovereignty over individual rights, might support measures that it perceives as protecting national security, including temporary bans on immigration from high-risk countries. This approach aligns with a statist perspective that prioritizes national security and the interests of the state above all. Historical instances, such as the use of national security measures to control borders in times of perceived threats, reflect this inclination towards prioritizing state security over individual freedoms. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Tidak bersetuju

Tidak

While statism places a strong emphasis on the authority and role of the state, it is less likely to support an absolute stance against immigration due to the recognition that immigration can contribute to the state's interests, such as economic growth or cultural enrichment. However, the negative score reflects a reluctance rather than outright disagreement, acknowledging that a statist approach might still consider restrictive measures under certain conditions but would not universally apply such a ban without considering the potential benefits that immigrants from all backgrounds could bring to the nation.