If a person knowingly engages in an activity that has a known potential outcome, such as pregnancy,…
In regards to pregnancy, no, whether or not you willingly decided to become pregnant in the first place does not change the outcome, because you will still always have that right of bodily autonomy; even if you initially wanted to become pregnant, that pregnancy still requires constant consent throughout the entire process, so if you ever change your mind and withdraw consent, then you have the right to do so and to take action. On the other hand, the outcome of your rock climbing incident is simply property damage of someone else's home, in which you would likely just owe damages to that homeowner.
Perhaps a more apt analogy would be if you chose to engage in a situation where you would be medically connected to another person to keep them alive for 9 months. By choosing to accept the procedure, are you then to be held responsible if you withdraw consent halfway through, thus killing them? I would argue that this would/should ultimately come down to whether or not the two parties had some kind of contractual agreement where you would have agreed to limited bodily autonomy rights, in which you would then be held liable for choosing to breech your contractual obligation, despite your own bodily autonomy. However, in a pregnancy, there is no such contract or agreement, so there is nobody that is actually "wronged" from you utilizing your own right to bodily autonomy, thus why it would still be logically and morally acceptable to have an abortion.
この不一致最初に返信してください。