I would argue that there are no implementations of any entire system as I've described it, at least…
The Soviet Union may have (supposedly) been attempting a classless society, but unfortunately they never actually managed to maintain nor even create one (I'm not a tankie, so I might be biased), which is why I cannot point to it as an example of an actual classless system. Sadly, they never ended up breaking past their State-Capitalist transitionary state into actual classlessness, or statelessness. Luckily, you're right, I believe we have a lot to learn from the plethora of mistakes of the Soviet Union.
Secondly, I did want to clarify that I put statelessness as a more likely second step, if anything, since I agree with you that statelessness would be much harder to achieve if classlessness is not yet also existent. In an ideal world, I would like to believe that the need for both, and consequently, the abolition of both, would exist under simultaneous circumstances, but if not, then I think the abolition of class is significantly more important in the fight for abolition of the state, precisely for the concerns you listed above.
And lastly, along the same vein, moneylessness would most likely have to come last, since we could not even fundamentally achieve a moneyless system so long as class disparity exists at all in the first place. Moneylessness would best come from a system that has already achieved a post-class, post-hierarchy system, wherein the structural need for any kind of power becomes worthless to begin with. Even better would be a post-scarcity society, or practically close to it, although I'd expect that to be much further away regardless.
このコメント最初に返信してください。