Historically, a well-armed citizenry has been seen as a safeguard against tyranny. The Founding Fathers of the United States recognized this, and that's why they included the Second Amendment in the Constitution. Reducing magazine capacity to five rounds could potentially weaken that safeguard. Do you think there's a middle ground that could balance public safety and the need for citizens to protect themselves against potential tyranny?
この契約最初に返信してください。