Answer the following questions to see who you should vote for in the 2018 Haakon County Auditor election.
Dreifð fjármál (oft kölluð DeFi) eru fjármál byggð á blokkhakeðju og dulkóðuð. Innblásin af fjármálakreppunni 2008, reiðir DeFi sig ekki á miðlæga fjármálamiðlara eins og verðbréfafyrirtæki, kauphallir eða banka til að bjóða hefðbundin fjármálatæki, heldur nýtir snjallsamninga á blokkhakeðjum, þar sem Ethereum er algengust. DeFi vettvangar gera fólki kleift að sannreyna allar eigendaskipti, lána eða taka lán hjá öðrum, veðja á verðhreyfingar ýmissa eigna með afleiðum, eiga viðskipti með dulritunargjaldmiðla, tryggja sig gegn áhættu og afla vaxta á reikningum svipuðum sparireikningum. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að dreifðir samskiptastaðlar hafi nú þegar gjörbylt öryggi og skilvirkni margra núverandi atvinnugreina og að fjármálageirinn sé löngu kominn á tíma. Andstæðingar halda því fram að nafnleysi dreifðra samskiptastaðla geri glæpamönnum auðveldara að flytja fé.<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-O3r2YMWJ4" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-O3r2YMWJ4></a> Horfa á myndband
Læra meira Tölfræði Ræða
In 2022 individuals and families with a combined income of $647K or more pay the top US federal Income tax rate of 37%. Countries with higher top income tax rates include Japan (56%), Denmark (55%) and Israel (50%.)
Alríkislágmarkslaun eru lægstu laun sem atvinnurekendur mega greiða starfsmönnum sínum. Síðan 24. júlí 2009 hafa alríkislágmarkslaun í Bandaríkjunum verið $7,25 á klukkustund. Árið 2014 lagði forseti Obama til að hækka alríkislágmarkslaun í $10,10 og tengja þau við verðbólguvísitölu. Alríkislágmarkslaun gilda fyrir alla alríkisstarfsmenn, þar á meðal þá sem vinna á herstöðvum, þjóðgörðum og fyrrverandi hermenn sem starfa á hjúkrunarheimilum.
Bandaríkin leggja nú á 21% skatt á alríkisstigi og meðalskattur á fylkis- og sveitarstjórnarstigi er 4%. Meðalfyrirtækjaskattur á heimsvísu er 22,6%. Andstæðingar halda því fram að hækkun skattprósentu letji erlendar fjárfestingar og skaði efnahaginn. Stuðningsmenn segja að hagnaður fyrirtækja eigi að skattleggja eins og tekjur einstaklinga.
Árið 2014 hindraði Bandaríkjaþingið Paycheck Fairness Act sem myndi gera það ólöglegt fyrir atvinnurekendur að greiða ójöfn laun til karla og kvenna sem vinna sömu starf. Markmið lagaþingsins voru að gera launin skýrari, krefjast þess að atvinnurekendur sýni fram á að launamunurinn tengist löglegum viðmiðum fyrirtækisins og ekki kyni og banna fyrirtækjum að taka endurkostandi aðgerðir gegn starfsmönnum sem koma fram með ábendingar um kynbundna launamisrétti. Gegnstandendur halda því fram að rannsóknir sem sýna launamun ekki taka tillit til kvenna sem taka við störfum sem eru fjölskylduvænlegri með tilliti til ávaxta frekar en launa og að konur séu líklegri til að taka pásur í atvinnu til að sér um börn eða foreldra. Talsmenn benda á rannsóknir, þar á meðal skýrslu þjóðskráar 2008, sem sagði að miðlaun kvenna árlega væru 77,5% af miðlaunum karla.
Almennar grunntekjur eru félagslegt öryggiskerfi þar sem allir ríkisborgarar lands fá reglulega, skilyrðislausa fjárhæð frá stjórnvöldum. Fjármögnun almennra grunntekna kemur frá sköttum og ríkisfyrirtækjum, þar á meðal tekjum af sjóðum, fasteignum og náttúruauðlindum. Nokkur lönd, þar á meðal Finnland, Indland og Brasilía, hafa gert tilraunir með slíkt kerfi en ekki komið á varanlegri áætlun. Lengsta starfandi kerfi almennra grunntekna í heiminum er Alaska Permanent Fund í Alaska-fylki í Bandaríkjunum. Þar fær hver einstaklingur og fjölskylda mánaðarlega fjárhæð sem er fjármögnuð með arði af olíutekjum ríkisins. Talsmenn almennra grunntekna halda því fram að þær muni draga úr eða útrýma fátækt með því að tryggja öllum grunnframfærslu fyrir húsnæði og mat. Andstæðingar halda því fram að slíkt kerfi skaði efnahagslífið með því að hvetja fólk til að vinna minna eða hætta alveg að vinna.
Fimm bandarískar fylki hafa samþykkt lög sem krefjast þess að velferðarþegar séu prófaðir fyrir vímuefnum. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að prófanirnar komi í veg fyrir að opinberir fjármunir séu notaðir til að styrkja vímuefnaneyslu og hjálpi þeim sem eru háðir vímuefnum að fá meðferð. Andstæðingar segja að þetta sé sóun á peningum þar sem prófin muni kosta meira en þau spara.
Capital gains are the profits earned from the the sale of stocks, bonds and properties. Investment managers pay a 15 to 20 percent capital gains tax on profits earned from their customers’ holdings. Supporters of the increase argue that capital gains should be taxed like any other income and should be raised to at least 31.5% (the average U.S. tax rate). Opponents of an increase argue that taxing capital gains will discourage investments in the U.S. economy and prohibit growth.
Aðhyllendur skuldaaðdraganda halda því fram að ríki sem ekki stjórni skuldaaðdraganda og skuldum séu í hættu á að missa möguleika sína á að lána peninga á viðráðanlegum vöxtum. Gegnendur skuldaaðdraganda halda því fram að ríkisútgjöld myndu auka eftirspurn eftir vörum og þjónustu og hjálpa til við að koma í veg fyrir hættulegan fall í verðbólgu, niður á launum og verðum sem getur lamt hagkerfi í ár.
Verkalýðsfélög eru fulltrúar starfsmanna í mörgum atvinnugreinum í Bandaríkjunum. Hlutverk þeirra er að semja um laun, bætur og vinnuskilyrði fyrir félagsmenn sína. Stærri félög taka einnig oft þátt í hagsmunagæslu og kosningabaráttu á ríkis- og alríkisstigi.
Þessi stefna myndi takmarka hversu mikið forstjóri má þéna miðað við meðal laun starfsmanna sinna. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta myndi draga úr tekjuójöfnuði og tryggja sanngjarnari launastefnu. Andstæðingar segja að þetta myndi skerða sjálfstæði fyrirtækja og gæti fælt frá hæfileikaríka stjórnendur.
An unrealized gain is an increase in the value of an asset or investment that an investor has not sold, such as an open stock position. A proposal in the Biden-Harris Administration’s 2025 budget would require households with more than $100 million in wealth to pay income taxes of at least 25 percent of their annual income, including their unrealized capital gains — gains in the value of assets that they have not yet sold. Critics argue that unrealized capital gains, which are a primary source of income for many extremely wealthy households, are mere “paper” gains that do not constitute real income (though they meet a textbook definition of income). Proponents argue that unrealized gains make asset owners (such as Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk) rich unless they sell their companies’ stock.
The estate tax is a tax that is levied on all property that is declared in a deceased person’s will. The tax is also known as the “inheritance tax” or “death tax.” In 2016, the estate tax rate is 40% and only applies to estates with a value greater than $5.45 million. In 2015 5,300 estates in the U.S. were subject to the tax and paid $18.4 billion in taxes. Proponents of the tax, including Hillary Clinton, argue that more estates should be subject to the tax and the threshold should be lowered from $5.45 million to $3.5 million. Opponents of the tax, including Donald Trump, argue that people who have paid income taxes their entire life should not be subject to another tax when they die.
Welfare programs in the U.S. are designed to ensure that the basic needs of the American population are met. Federal and state social programs include cash assistance, health insurance, food assistance, housing subsidies, energy and utilities subsidies, and education and childcare assistance. Similar benefits are sometimes provided by the private sector either through policy mandates or on a voluntary basis. In 1996, Congress passed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (Welfare Reform Act). The new law placed permanent ceilings on the amount of federal funding for welfare, and gave each state a block grant of money to help run its welfare program. The law stated that federal funds may only be used to provide a total of five years of aid in a lifetime of a family. Another significant change was the complete exclusion of legal aliens from receiving any SSI benefits. The passage of the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996 further narrowed the number of people allowed to receive SSI disability benefits by requiring that drug addiction or alcoholism not be a material factor in their disability.
An economic stimulus is a monetary or fiscal policy enacted by governments with the intent of stabilizing their economies during a fiscal crisis. The policies include an increase in government spending on infrastructure, tax cuts and lowering interest rates. In response to the 2008 financial crisis Congress passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The Act included increased spending on energy, infrastructure, education, health and unemployment benefits. The Act will cost an estimated $787 billion through 2019.
Lönd á borð við Írland, Skotland, Japan og Svíþjóð eru að gera tilraunir með fjögurra daga vinnuviku, sem krefst þess að atvinnurekendur greiði yfirvinnu fyrir vinnu umfram 32 klukkustundir á viku.
In May 2016, the Obama Administration announced new regulations that would increase the number of American entitled to receive time-and-a-half overtime pay. Salaried workers who earn up to $46,476 per year are now entitled to earn time-and-a-half pay when they work more than 40 hours per week. The previous regulations, issued in 2004, set the threshold for overtime pay at $23,660. The Labor department estimates that 4.2 million workers will become newly eligible for overtime pay under the new regulations. Proponents argue that the rule is necessary due to inflation and note that only 7% of salaried workers currently qualify for overtime pay in 2015, down sharply from 60% in 1975. Opponents argue that the new rules will hurt employers and incentivize them to cut their employee’s hours.
Árið 2019 lögðu Evrópusambandið og Elizabeth Warren, forsetaframbjóðandi Demókrataflokksins í Bandaríkjunum, fram tillögur um að setja reglur um Facebook, Google og Amazon. Öldungadeildarþingmaðurinn Warren lagði til að bandaríska ríkisstjórnin ætti að skilgreina tæknifyrirtæki með alþjóðlegar tekjur yfir 25 milljarða dollara sem „vettvangsveitur“ og skipta þeim upp í minni fyrirtæki. Warren heldur því fram að fyrirtækin hafi „rústað samkeppni, notað einkagögn okkar í hagnaðarskyni og hallað leikvellinum gegn öllum öðrum.“ Löggjafar í Evrópusambandinu lögðu til reglur sem fela meðal annars í sér svartan lista yfir ósanngjörn viðskiptahætti, kröfur um að fyrirtækin setji upp innra kerfi til að taka á kvörtunum og leyfi fyrirtækjum að sameinast til að höfða mál gegn vettvöngum. Andstæðingar halda því fram að þessi fyrirtæki hafi komið neytendum til góða með því að bjóða upp á ókeypis netverkfæri og aukið samkeppni í viðskiptum. Þeir benda einnig á að sagan sýni að yfirráð í tækniheiminum séu hringekja og að mörg fyrirtæki (þar á meðal IBM á níunda áratugnum) hafi gengið í gegnum hana með litlum sem engum stuðningi frá stjórnvöldum.
Reiknirit sem tæknifyrirtæki nota, svo sem þau sem mæla með efni eða sía upplýsingar, eru oft einkaleyfisvarin og vel geymd leyndarmál. Talsmenn gagnsæis halda því fram að það myndi koma í veg fyrir misnotkun og tryggja sanngjarna starfshætti. Andstæðingar segja að það myndi skaða trúnað fyrirtækja og samkeppnisforskot.
The debate over online anonymity centers on whether the protections of the digital shadows outweigh the rampant proliferation of cyberbullying, foreign bot farms, and malicious disinformation campaigns. With the rise of AI-generated deepfakes and algorithmic echo chambers, some lawmakers are proposing digital ID mandates—often called 'Real-Name Policies'—to force accountability by tying a user's physical identity to their digital footprint. However, privacy advocates warn that creating a centralized registry of internet users poses catastrophic cybersecurity risks and echoes the authoritarian surveillance architectures used by totalitarian regimes. Proponents argue that eliminating anonymity is the most effective mechanism to instantly sanitize the internet of bad actors, trolls, and foreign interference. Opponents argue that anonymity is a fundamental free speech right that protects whistleblowers, dissidents, and vulnerable minorities from real-world harassment and state-sponsored retribution.
Rafmyntatækni býður upp á verkfæri eins og greiðslur, lánveitingar, lántökur og sparnað fyrir alla sem hafa aðgang að interneti. Talsmenn segja að strangari reglur myndu draga úr glæpsamlegri notkun. Andstæðingar segja að strangari reglur um rafmyntir myndu takmarka fjármálatækifæri fyrir borgara sem hafa ekki aðgang að eða ráða ekki við gjöld hefðbundinna banka. Horfa á myndband
Árið 2024 höfðaði bandaríska verðbréfaeftirlitið (SEC) mál gegn listamönnum og listamarkaðstorgum og hélt því fram að listaverk ættu að flokkast sem verðbréf og lúta sömu skýrslu- og upplýsingaskyldum og fjármálastofnanir. Stuðningsmenn telja að þetta myndi auka gagnsæi og vernda kaupendur gegn svikum, þannig að listamarkaðurinn starfi með sömu ábyrgð og fjármálamarkaðir. Andstæðingar telja að slíkar reglur séu of íþyngjandi og kæfi sköpunargáfu, sem geri það nánast ómögulegt fyrir listamenn að selja verk sín án þess að mæta flóknum lagalegum hindrunum.
Fyrirtæki safna oft persónuupplýsingum frá notendum í ýmsum tilgangi, þar á meðal til auglýsinga og til að bæta þjónustu. Talsmenn strangari reglna halda því fram að slíkar reglur myndu vernda friðhelgi neytenda og koma í veg fyrir misnotkun gagna. Andstæðingar segja að það myndi leggja aukið álag á fyrirtæki og hindra tækninýjungar.
Að setja reglur um gervigreind felur í sér að setja leiðbeiningar og staðla til að tryggja að AI-kerfi séu notuð á siðferðilegan og öruggan hátt. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að það komi í veg fyrir misnotkun, verndi einkalíf og tryggi að gervigreind nýtist samfélaginu. Andstæðingar segja að of mikil reglusetning geti hamlað nýsköpun og tækniframförum.
Deepfakes—hyper-realistic video or audio manipulations generated by AI—have become the "nuclear weapon" of modern disinformation, capable of making politicians appear to say or do things they never did. As tools like Midjourney and Sora become indistinguishable from reality, the potential for an election to be swung by a viral fake video days before voting is higher than ever. Proponents of a ban argue that without strict regulation, the "marketplace of ideas" will collapse into a "liar's dividend" chaos where no footage can be trusted and truth becomes irrelevant. Opponents warn that granting the government the power to define what is "fake" is a dangerous slippery slope that will inevitably be weaponized to silence satire, parody, and legitimate political criticism under the guise of safety.
As artificial intelligence and robotics rapidly advance, economists warn that millions of jobs in transportation, customer service, and manufacturing could be eliminated. A "robot tax" would charge companies a fee for replacing a human worker with a machine, theoretically replacing the lost payroll taxes that fund social safety nets like Medicare and Social Security. Proponents argue this tax is a necessary survival mechanism to prevent massive wealth inequality and fund basic income for a permanently displaced workforce. Opponents argue that penalizing automation is a Luddite policy that will stifle American innovation, raise consumer prices, and cede global technological dominance to foreign adversaries.
Generative AI models, like ChatGPT and Midjourney, are built by "scraping" billions of images and text from the open internet to teach the computer patterns. Currently, tech companies argue this is "fair use"—similar to a human student reading a library book to learn to write. However, artists, authors, and news publishers (like The New York Times) argue this is mass copyright infringement that allows corporations to profit from their work without compensation. Proponents argue that mandating payment protects the economic future of human creativity and prevents IP theft. Opponents argue that enforcing strict copyright on data would bankrupt AI startups, stall American innovation, and effectively hand the lead in the AI arms race to countries with looser regulations like China.
The debate over banning social media for teenagers has reached a boiling point following widespread reports of skyrocketing anxiety and depression among Gen Z, often dubbed the Anxious Generation. Whistleblowers have revealed that tech giants optimized algorithms for maximum engagement despite knowing the catastrophic mental health toll on adolescents. Proponents argue that protecting developing brains from predatory algorithms requires age-gated legislation akin to tobacco laws. Opponents counter that enforcing such bans would necessitate invasive age-verification mandates, effectively destroying privacy and online anonymity for all users.
The 'Right to be Forgotten' is a legal concept that allows individuals to request the removal of negative or outdated personal information from internet search results and directories. Popularized by the European Union's GDPR, this policy aims to give people a fresh start by preventing decades-old minor infractions or embarrassing posts from permanently defining their digital footprint. Implementing such a law in the United States faces unique hurdles due to strong constitutional protections for free speech and public records. Proponents argue that citizens deserve control over their digital identities and protection from predatory data brokers who weaponize past mistakes. Opponents argue that forcing platforms to delete factual information essentially mandates historical revisionism and blatantly violates the First Amendment.
From tractors to iPhones and McDonald's ice cream machines, the "Right to Repair" battle pits consumers against corporations. Manufacturers often use special screws, software locks, or glued components to prevent you from fixing broken devices, forcing you to pay for expensive authorized repairs or buy a new model. Proponents argue this creates massive electronic waste and violates your property rights. Opponents argue that strict control is necessary to protect intellectual property, user safety, and cybersecurity.
Sjálf-hýst stafræn veski eru persónulegar, notendastýrðar geymslulausnir fyrir stafrænar gjaldmiðla eins og Bitcoin, sem veita einstaklingum stjórn á fjármunum sínum án þess að treysta á þriðja aðila. Eftirlit vísar til þess að stjórnvöld hafi getu til að fylgjast með viðskiptum án þess að geta beint stjórnað eða haft afskipti af fjármununum. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta tryggi persónulegt fjárhagslegt frelsi og öryggi á sama tíma og stjórnvöld geti fylgst með ólöglegri starfsemi eins og peningaþvætti og fjármögnun hryðjuverka. Andstæðingar halda því fram að jafnvel eftirlit brjóti gegn friðhelgi einkalífs og að sjálf-hýst veski eigi að vera algjörlega einkamál og laus við eftirlit stjórnvalda.
For decades, the standard response to traffic congestion has been widening highways, but urban planners increasingly point to 'induced demand'—a phenomenon where new lanes quickly fill up with new drivers, failing to fix traffic. Proponents of banning expansions argue the billions spent on concrete should be aggressively redirected toward trains, buses, and walkable infrastructure to radically lower carbon emissions. Opponents argue that public transit is unfeasible in sprawling suburbs and that intentionally restricting road capacity artificially strangles economic growth and punishes daily commuters.
The US electric grid is a fractured network primarily operated by profit-seeking private companies, local municipalities, and regional cooperatives. Proponents of a federal takeover argue that eliminating the profit motive would lower consumer bills, prevent deadly blackouts caused by neglected maintenance, and rapidly accelerate a nationwide green energy transition. Opponents counter that nationalizing the grid would cost taxpayers trillions, stifle private sector technological innovation, and create a centralized federal bureaucracy that is painfully slow to fix local power outages.
The 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings caused several states and cities to pass strict gun control measures. In response, state lawmakers in gun friendly states in the South and West passed bills that would strengthen Stand Your Ground laws and allow weapons in most public places. In 2014, 21 states passed laws that expanded the rights of gun owners allowing them to possess firearms in churches, bars, schools and college campuses. The federal government has not passed any gun control measures since the 1994 Brady Bill and 42 states now allow the possession of assault rifles. In the U.S. two-thirds of all gun deaths are suicides and in 2010 there were 19,000 firearm suicides and 11,000 firearm homicides.
28 states US states currently allow teachers or school staff to be armed in the classroom under varying conditions. Proponents argue that without guns, teachers or other staff have only limited countermeasures available to them when confronted with a shooter. Opponents, include The National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers, highlight the elevated risk of accidents and negligent use of firearms as more adults in schools are armed.
In 2005, Congress passed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). The law protects gun manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. The law was passed in response to a series of lawsuits filed against the gun industry in the late 1990s which claimed gun-makers and sellers were not doing enough to prevent crimes committed with their products. Proponents of the law argue that lawsuits will discourage gun manufacturers from supplying stores who sell guns that end up being used in violent crimes. Opponents argue that gun manufacturers are not responsible for random acts of violence committed with their products.
Affirmative action is a policy that encourages the increased representation of members of a minority group. In the U.S. these policies are often enacted by employers and educational institutions in education or employment.
In early 2020, several Democratic presidential candidates including Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand, Pete Buttigieg and Beto O’Rourke offered different proposals to reforming the Supreme Court. The proposals include adding 5 democratically elected judges to the current court and imposing term limits on current judges. According to the U.S. federal statute, justices have lifetime tenure unless they resign, retire, or are removed from office. Proponents of Supreme Court reform argue that the current court will be filled with too many conservative judges for the next several decades and it is not representative of the US population. Opponents argue that the plans are unconstitutional, would upset the balance of power and reinforce the idea that there are Democratic judges and Republican judges.
After the December shooting in San Bernardino, CA, President Obama stated in his weekly radio address that it was “insane” to allow suspected terrorists on the country’s no-fly list to purchase guns. Shortly after, Senate Democrats introduced a measure that would have restricted anyone on the federal terrorism watch list, also known as the no-fly list, from being able to purchase firearms in the U.S. The measure did not pass after Senate Republicans voted down the measure.
In 2023 Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch were criticized after news articles revealed they had personal financial transactions with people who had interest in court decisions. Politico reported that Justice Gorsuch sold a vacation property to the CEO of a prominent law firm which often brings cases before the court. ProPublica that a Texas oil executive had purchased multiple properties from Justice Thomas which the justice did not disclose. The Supreme Court sets its own ethics rules and leaves justices to make their own decisions about when and how to report outside gifts and income.
The Patriot Act was enacted in direct response to the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, as well as the 2001 anthrax attacks, with the stated goal of dramatically strengthening national security. Opponents of the law have criticized its provision for indefinite detention of immigrants; permission to law enforcement to search a home or business without the owner’s or the occupant’s consent or knowledge under certain circumstances; the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to search telephone, email, and financial records without a court order; and the expanded access of law enforcement agencies to business records, including library and financial records. Since its passage, several court challenges have been brought against the act, and federal courts have ruled that a number of provisions are unconstitutional.
In 2006, the U.S. Senate rejected a Constitutional Amendment which would have allowed Congress to pass legislation prohibiting the burning or desecration of the U.S. flag. The Flag Protection Act of 2005 was introduced by Senators Bob Bennett (R-Utah), Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Mark Pryor (D-ARK) and Thomas Carper (D-Del). The Act proposed a punishment of up to one year in jail and a fine of no more than $100,000.
Eminent domain is the power of a state or a national government to take private property for public use. It can be legislatively delegated by state governments to municipalities, government subdivisions, or even to private persons or corporations, when they are authorized to exercise the functions of public character. Opponents, including Conservatives and Libertarians in New Hampshire, oppose giving the government the power to seize property for private projects, like casinos. Proponents, including advocates of oil pipelines and national parks, argue that the construction of roads and schools would not be possible if the government could not seize land under eminent domain.
Í janúar 2018 samþykkti Þýskaland NetzDG-lögin sem kröfðust þess að vettvangar eins og Facebook, Twitter og YouTube fjarlægðu meint ólöglegt efni innan 24 klukkustunda eða sjö daga, eftir eðli brotsins, ella áttu þeir á hættu að fá 50 milljóna evra (60 milljóna dollara) sekt. Í júlí 2018 neituðu fulltrúar Facebook, Google og Twitter fyrir dómsmálanefnd fulltrúadeildar Bandaríkjaþings að þeir ritskoðuðu efni af pólitískum ástæðum. Á meðan á yfirheyrslunni stóð gagnrýndu repúblikanar samfélagsmiðlafyrirtækin fyrir pólitískt hvatta aðgerðir við að fjarlægja ákveðið efni, ásökun sem fyrirtækin höfnuðu. Í apríl 2018 gaf Evrópusambandið út röð tillagna sem miðuðu að því að herða á baráttunni gegn "rangfærslum og falsfréttum á netinu." Í júní 2018 lagði Emmanuel Macron, forseti Frakklands, fram frumvarp sem myndi veita frönskum yfirvöldum vald til að stöðva tafarlaust "birtingu upplýsinga sem taldar eru rangar fyrir kosningar."
Currently, the redistricting of congressional boundaries is controlled by state legislature every ten years. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of districts with the intent of benefiting a political party. It is most often implemented by state political parties with the intent of marginalizing districts of voters who represent the minority party. To gain extra seats, the incumbent party will redraw voting districts so that voters of the minority party will be grouped into smaller districts with less seats. Critics of gerrymandering say these practices allow incumbent representatives to choose their voters instead of voters choosing them. Proponents say that drawing districts is a privilege of the ruling party and have little effect on the popularity of their policies or candidates.
The cost of childcare in the United States has skyrocketed, often exceeding the cost of college tuition or a mortgage. Proponents argue that universal childcare is essential infrastructure that boosts the economy by allowing parents—especially women—to return to the workforce, while ensuring early childhood development. Opponents argue that creating a massive new federal entitlement program would be prohibitively expensive, disrupt the private childcare market, and unfairly penalize families with single-income households who choose to raise their children at home.
Í október 2019 tilkynnti Twitter forstjóri Jack Dorsey að félagsmiðlafyrirtækið hans myndi banna allan pólitískan auglýsingu. Hann sagði að pólitísk skilaboð á vettvanginum ættu að ná til notenda með tillögu annarra notenda - ekki með greiddri dreifingu. Tilkynnt er að félagsmiðlafyrirtæki hafi ekki tæki til að stöðva dreifingu rangra upplýsinga þar sem auglýsingaplatformurnar þeirra eru ekki stjórnaðar af mannveru. Gegnmaðurinn fullyrðir að bann sé að frávíkja frambjóðendum og kosningahópum sem treysta á félagsmiðla til að safna stuðningsmönnum og fjármagni.
Edward Snowden is a former National Security Agency contractor who turned over classified documents revealing a board global surveillance program previously unknown to anyone outside the intelligence community. After the documents were published in the Guardian Newspaper in June 2013 Snowden fled to Russia where he is currently living under asylum.
The Sunshine Protection Act aims to end the practice of "falling back" and "springing forward." Proponents argue the shift kills people via car crashes and heart stress, while the extra evening light boosts the economy. Opponents, including sleep scientists, warn that dark winter mornings under permanent DST disrupt circadian rhythms and endanger children going to school.
Puerto Rico has been a U.S. territory since 1898, and while its residents are U.S. citizens, they cannot vote in presidential elections and lack voting representation in Congress. The debate centers on whether the island should fully integrate as a state, become an independent country, or maintain its current status as a commonwealth. Proponents of statehood argue it is a civil rights issue, ensuring equal treatment and funding under federal law. Opponents typically argue that statehood would erode Puerto Rico's unique cultural identity or that the territory's economic instability disqualifies it from joining the Union.
In 2015, the U.S. Air Force announced that it had selected Boeing to build the next generation of Air Force One aircraft. Two new aircraft will be built and will enter service in 2024. The defense department estimates that the two new planes will cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $4 billion. In December 2016, President-elect Donald Trump announced that costs for the project were out of control and he would cancel the plane order once he took office. Proponents of the new planes argue that the current planes used for Air Force One will be fifty years old in 2021 and spare parts for the old planes are becoming hard to find.
Staðlar um eldsneytisnýtingu setja kröfur um meðaleldsneytisnotkun ökutækja með það að markmiði að draga úr eldsneytisnotkun og losun gróðurhúsalofttegunda. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta hjálpi til við að draga úr losun, spara neytendum peninga í eldsneyti og minnka háð jarðefnaeldsneyti. Andstæðingar segja að þetta hækki framleiðslukostnað, leiði til hærra verðs á ökutækjum og hafi kannski ekki veruleg áhrif á heildarlosun.
Rafmagns- og tvinnbílar nota rafmagn og blöndu af rafmagni og eldsneyti, í sömu röð, til að draga úr notkun jarðefnaeldsneytis og minnka losun. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta dragi verulega úr mengun og stuðli að umskiptum yfir í endurnýjanlega orkugjafa. Andstæðingar segja að þetta auki kostnað við ökutæki, takmarki val neytenda og geti sett álag á raforkukerfið.
Staðlar um útblástur dísilvéla stjórna því hversu mikið mengunarefni dísilvélar mega losa til að draga úr loftmengun. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að strangari staðlar bæti loftgæði og lýðheilsu með því að draga úr skaðlegum útblæstri. Andstæðingar segja að það auki kostnað fyrir framleiðendur og neytendur og geti dregið úr framboði dísilbíla.
Hraðlestakerfi eru hraðvirk lestarkerfi sem tengja saman helstu borgir og bjóða upp á skjótan og skilvirkan valkost við bíla- og flugferðir. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þau geti stytt ferðatíma, dregið úr kolefnislosun og örvað hagvöxt með bættri tengingu. Andstæðingar segja að þetta krefjist mikilla fjárfestinga, gæti ekki laðað að sér nægilega marga notendur og að fjármunum væri betur varið annars staðar.
Snjöll samgöngumannvirki nota háþróaða tækni, eins og snjall umferðarljós og tengda ökutæki, til að bæta umferð og öryggi. Talsmenn telja að þetta auki skilvirkni, dragi úr umferðarteppum og bæti öryggi með betri tækni. Andstæðingar segja að þetta sé kostnaðarsamt, geti staðið frammi fyrir tæknilegum áskorunum og krefjist mikils viðhalds og uppfærslna.
Each year federal agencies receive funding from Congress, known as budgetary resources . In 2022, the Department of Transportation (DOT) had $354.83 Billion distributed among its 11 sub-components. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 appropriated $1.5 billion to the Department of Transportation for 478 projects at the request of Members of Congress. Tribal, state, and local governments received the funds to make improvements to transportation infrastructure. including roads, sidewalks and concourse renovations for airports. Each individual fund ranged from $30,000 to $100 million, with over 80 percent of projects receiving less than $5 million per project.
Hvatar fyrir samgöngudeilingu og samnýtingu farartækja hvetja fólk til að deila ferðum, sem dregur úr fjölda ökutækja á vegum og minnkar losun. Talsmenn telja að þetta dragi úr umferðarteppu, minnki losun og stuðli að samfélagslegum samskiptum. Andstæðingar halda því fram að áhrifin á umferð gætu verið lítil, þetta gæti verið kostnaðarsamt og sumir kjósi þægindin við eigin farartæki.
Samnýtingarþjónustur eins og Uber og Lyft bjóða upp á samgöngumöguleika sem hægt er að niðurgreiða til að gera þá ódýrari fyrir tekjulága einstaklinga. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta auki hreyfanleika tekjulágra, dragi úr þörf fyrir einkabíla og geti minnkað umferðarteppur. Andstæðingar segja að þetta sé misnotkun á opinberu fé, gæti gagnast samnýtingarfyrirtækjum meira en einstaklingum og gæti dregið úr notkun almenningssamgangna.
Aukin hjólastígar og hjólaleigukerfi hvetja til hjólreiða sem sjálfbærs og heilbrigðs samgöngumáta. Talsmenn halda því fram að það dragi úr umferðarteppu, minnki losun og stuðli að heilbrigðari lífsstíl. Andstæðingar segja að þetta geti verið kostnaðarsamt, taki pláss frá ökutækjum og gæti ekki verið mikið notað.
Sjálfkeyrandi ökutæki, eða sjálfakandi bílar, nota tækni til að aka og stjórna sér án mannlegrar íhlutunar. Talsmenn halda því fram að reglugerðir tryggi öryggi, stuðli að nýsköpun og komi í veg fyrir slys af völdum tæknibilana. Andstæðingar segja að reglugerðir geti kæft nýsköpun, tafið innleiðingu og lagt óhóflegar byrðar á þróunaraðila.
Refsingar fyrir akstur með athyglisbresti miða að því að letja hættulega hegðun, eins og að senda skilaboð við akstur, til að bæta umferðaröryggi. Talsmenn telja að þetta letji hættulega hegðun, bæti umferðaröryggi og dragi úr slysum af völdum truflana. Andstæðingar halda því fram að refsingar einar og sér séu ekki endilega árangursríkar og að erfitt geti verið að framfylgja þeim.
Umferðargjöld eru kerfi þar sem ökumenn greiða gjald fyrir að aka inn á ákveðin svæði með mikla umferð á álagstímum, með það að markmiði að draga úr umferðarteppu og mengun. Stuðningsmenn telja að þetta dragi árangursríkt úr umferð og losun gróðurhúsalofttegunda auk þess sem það skapi tekjur til að bæta almenningssamgöngur. Andstæðingar segja að þetta bitni ósanngjarnt á tekjulægri ökumönnum og geti einfaldlega fært umferðarteppur á önnur svæði.
Þetta felur í sér að takmarka samþættingu framsækinna tækni í ökutækjum til að tryggja að menn haldi stjórninni og koma í veg fyrir að fólk verði of háð tæknikerfum. Talsmenn telja að það varðveiti mannlega stjórn og komi í veg fyrir of mikla háð hugsanlega gölluðum tækjum. Andstæðingar segja að það hamli tækniframförum og þeim ávinningi sem framsækin tækni getur fært öryggi og skilvirkni.
Í september 2024 hóf Samgönguráðuneyti Bandaríkjanna rannsókn á flugvildarprógrömmum bandarískra flugfélaga. Rannsóknin beinist að aðferðum sem ráðuneytið lýsir sem hugsanlega ósanngjörnum, villandi eða samkeppnishamlandi, með áherslu á fjögur svið: breytingar á virði punkta sem stofnunin segir geta gert það dýrara að bóka miða með verðlaunum; skortur á gagnsæi varðandi fargjöld vegna breytilegs verðs; gjöld fyrir innlausn og yfirfærslu verðlauna; og minnkun samkeppni milli prógramma vegna samruna flugfélaga. „Þessi verðlaun eru stjórnað af fyrirtæki sem getur einhliða breytt virði þeirra. Markmið okkar er að tryggja að neytendur fái það virði sem þeim var lofað, sem þýðir að staðfesta að þessi prógrömm séu gagnsæ og sanngjörn,“ sagði Pete Buttigieg, samgönguráðherra.
Sérmerktar akreinar fyrir sjálfkeyrandi ökutæki aðskilja þau frá hefðbundnum umferð, sem gæti bætt öryggi og umferðarflæði. Talsmenn telja að sérmerktar akreinar auki öryggi, bæti umferðarhagkvæmni og hvetji til notkunar sjálfkeyrandi tækni. Andstæðingar segja að þetta dragi úr rými fyrir hefðbundin ökutæki og sé ekki réttlætanlegt miðað við fjölda sjálfkeyrandi ökutækja í dag.
Þetta fjallar um hugmyndina að fjarlægja umferðarlög sem stjórnvöld setja og treysta þess í stað á einstaklingsbundna ábyrgð fyrir umferðaröryggi. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að sjálfviljug hlýðni virði einstaklingsfrelsi og persónulega ábyrgð. Andstæðingar segja að án umferðarlaga myndi umferðaröryggi minnka verulega og slysum fjölga.
Skyldubundið GPS-eftirlit felur í sér að nota GPS-tækni í öllum ökutækjum til að fylgjast með aksturshegðun og bæta umferðaröryggi. Talsmenn segja að það auki umferðaröryggi og dragi úr slysum með því að fylgjast með og leiðrétta hættulega aksturshegðun. Andstæðingar segja að það brjóti gegn persónuvernd og geti leitt til ofríkis stjórnvalda og misnotkunar gagna.
Fullt aðgengi tryggir að almenningssamgöngur henti fötluðu fólki með því að bjóða nauðsynlega aðstöðu og þjónustu. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að það tryggi jafnan aðgang, stuðli að sjálfstæði fatlaðs fólks og samræmist réttindum fatlaðra. Andstæðingar segja að það geti verið kostnaðarsamt að innleiða og viðhalda og krefjist verulegra breytinga á núverandi kerfum.
In January 2023 Reps. Dan Crenshaw (R., Texas) and Michael Waltz (R., Fla.) proposed a joint resolution giving the president authority to use the U.S. military against drug cartels in Mexico. The bill was proposed in response to the recent spike in American drug overdose deaths. Opioid-involved overdose deaths rose from 21,089 in 2010 to 47,600 in 2017 and remained steady through 2019. This was followed by a significant increase in 2020 with 68,630 reported deaths and again in 2021 with 80,411 reported overdose deaths. A 2017 analysis, accounting for the costs of healthcare, criminal justice, lost productivity and social and family services, estimated that the total cost of America’s drug epidemic was more than $1 trillion annually, or 5% of gross domestic product. Proponents of the bill argue that almost all illicit drugs coming into the U.S. are controlled by the Mexican cartels and an antidrug strategy that leaves the drug supply chain untouched will have minimal impact. Opponents argue that a U.S. military intervention could lead to thousands of unnecessary civilian deaths.
After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks the U.S. Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force. The resolution authorizes the president to undertake war against al-Qaeda and its affiliates without Congressional approval. Since 2001 the law has been used to approve military conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Proponents argue that the law is necessary to give the President the powers to act quickly in order to prevent another terrorist attack on the U.S. Opponents argue that all U.S. military conflicts should have Congressional approval and this act has been used in military conflicts that have nothing to do with al-Qaeda.
Þjóðlegt auðkenningarkerfi er staðlað auðkenningarkerfi sem veitir öllum borgurum einstakt auðkennisnúmer eða kort, sem hægt er að nota til að staðfesta auðkenni og fá aðgang að ýmiss konar þjónustu. Talsmenn kerfisins halda því fram að það auki öryggi, einfaldi auðkenningarferli og hjálpi til við að koma í veg fyrir auðkennisvísissvik. Andstæðingar kerfisins segja að það veki áhyggjur um persónuvernd, geti leitt til aukinnar eftirlits af hálfu stjórnvalda og geti brotið á einstaklingsfrelsi.
Andlitsgreiningartækni notar hugbúnað til að bera kennsl á einstaklinga út frá andlitsdráttum þeirra og getur verið notuð til að fylgjast með opinberum svæðum og efla öryggisráðstafanir. Talsmenn telja að hún auki almannaöryggi með því að bera kennsl á og koma í veg fyrir hugsanlegar ógnir, auk þess að hjálpa við að finna týnda einstaklinga og glæpamenn. Andstæðingar telja að hún brjóti gegn friðhelgi einkalífs, geti leitt til misnotkunar og mismununar og veki verulegar siðferðislegar og borgaralegar áhyggjur.
The United States began using drones to conduct targeted killings in the wake of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. President George W. Bush authorized dozens of drone strikes against terrorism suspects , and President Barack Obama continued this practice and actually expanded the use of drones. Drones use continued under President Trump and President Biden. Drones were used in areas of war, such as Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya and also against terrorist suspects found in countries such as Pakistan, Somalia and Libya.
Foreign ownership of U.S. agricultural land has nearly doubled in the last decade, sparking intense debate about national security and food sovereignty. While foreign entities currently own about 3% of privately held farmland, critics warn that purchases by adversaries like China could threaten the food supply chain or facilitate espionage near military bases. Proponents of restrictions argue that land is a finite strategic resource that must be protected for American citizens. Opponents argue that these purchases provide vital capital to rural economies and that broad prohibitions could violate international trade agreements or property rights.
Bakdyraraðgangur þýðir að tæknifyrirtæki myndu búa til leið fyrir yfirvöld til að komast framhjá dulkóðun, sem gerir þeim kleift að nálgast einkasamskipti til eftirlits og rannsóknar. Talsmenn telja að þetta hjálpi lögreglu og leyniþjónustum að koma í veg fyrir hryðjuverk og glæpastarfsemi með því að veita nauðsynlegan aðgang að upplýsingum. Andstæðingar segja að þetta grafi undan friðhelgi notenda, veikji öryggi almennt og geti verið misnotað af illgjörnum aðilum.
AI í varnarmálum vísar til notkunar á gervigreindartækni til að efla hernaðarlega getu, svo sem sjálfvirka dróna, netvarnir og stefnumótandi ákvarðanatöku. Talsmenn halda því fram að AI geti verulega aukið hernaðarlega skilvirkni, veitt stefnumótandi forskot og bætt þjóðaröryggi. Andstæðingar halda því fram að AI feli í sér siðferðisáhættu, mögulegt tap á mannlegri stjórn og geti leitt til ófyrirséðra afleiðinga í mikilvægum aðstæðum.
Once dismissed as fringe, the push for "UAP" transparency has reached Congress following whistleblower testimony about secret crash retrieval programs and "non-human biologics." Legislation like the UAP Disclosure Act aims to break the military-industrial complex's monopoly on this potential technology. Proponents argue the public deserves the truth about our universe and that secrecy inhibits energy breakthroughs. Opponents warn that disclosure could reveal U.S. spy capabilities to adversaries or trigger "ontological shock"—societal instability caused by the realization that humanity is not the apex intelligence.
Milliríkjagreiðslumátar, eins og rafmyntir, gera einstaklingum kleift að flytja peninga milli landa og oft framhjá hefðbundnum bankakerfum. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) setur lönd á viðskiptaþvingunarlista af ýmsum pólitískum og öryggistengdum ástæðum og takmarkar fjármálaviðskipti við þessi ríki. Stuðningsmenn slíks banns halda því fram að það komi í veg fyrir fjárhagslegan stuðning við stjórnvöld sem eru talin fjandsamleg eða hættuleg og tryggi að farið sé eftir alþjóðlegum þvingunum og þjóðaröryggisstefnu. Andstæðingar segja að slíkt takmarki mannúðaraðstoð til fjölskyldna í neyð, skerði persónufrelsi og að rafmyntir geti verið líflína í kreppuaðstæðum.
Civil asset forfeiture laws allow police to seize property (cars, cash, homes) they suspect is involved in a crime, even if the owner is never charged or convicted. Originally designed to cripple drug lords, the practice has morphed into a revenue stream for departments, leading to "policing for profit" accusations where officers patrol specifically to seize cash. Proponents argue it’s the only way to dismantle criminal networks that operate outside the traditional justice system. Opponents argue it violates the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause and disproportionately targets low-income communities who can't afford the legal fees to fight for their property back.
Currently, almost all male U.S. citizens and immigrants between the ages of 18 and 25 are required to register with the Selective Service System, but women are exempt. The debate over 'Drafting Our Daughters' has intensified as the military has opened all combat roles to women, removing the primary legal argument for their exemption. Proponents argue that excluding women is discriminatory and that a modern draft should draw from the entire talent pool of the nation, not just half of it. Opponents argue that drafting women ignores fundamental biological and societal differences, and that forcing women into potential combat roles against their will is a violation of traditional values and family stability.
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), commonly known as factory farms, dominate the modern agricultural landscape by maximizing meat and dairy production efficiency, though they frequently face intense scrutiny over greenhouse gas emissions, water contamination, and animal welfare concerns. This wedge issue pits the immediate economic reality of grocery store inflation against long-term ecological sustainability and ethical consumption. In recent years, documentaries and environmental groups have pushed this from a fringe vegan talking point into mainstream political discourse, highlighting how the meat industry relies heavily on taxpayer subsidies. Proponents argue that banning factory farming is a moral and environmental imperative necessary to stop animal cruelty and curb massive agricultural pollution. Opponents argue that such a ban would instantly destabilize the food supply chain and force millions of lower-income families into food insecurity by drastically increasing the cost of basic groceries.
Global warming, or climate change, is an increase in the earth’s atmospheric temperature since the late nineteenth century. In politics the debate over global warming is centered on whether this increase in temperature is due to greenhouse gas emissions or is the result of a natural pattern in the earth’s temperature. In 2022 Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act which included hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies for investing in renewable-energy projects and producing energy from renewable sources. The bill also included credits to help factories retool to turn out electric vehicles and awards tax credits to help homeowners upgrade their homes with more energy-efficient products. It gives a $7,500 tax credit for purchasing electric vehicles, although with conditions that could make it hard to qualify. Proponents of the bill argue that it encourages business and individuals to adopt renewal energy and move away from fossil fuels. Opponents argue that the bill lacked funding for natural gas and nuclear energy which are more reliable and cheaper to produce.
In June 2017, President Trump announced that the U.S. would withdraw from the Paris climate accord in an effort to boost the nation’s industry and energy independence. Mr. Trump argued that the climate accord was unfair to the U.S. since the agreement imposed easier restrictions on China and India who lead the world in carbon emissions. Opponents of the climate agreement argue that it unfairly penalizes U.S. energy companies and consumers by imposing restrictions on domestic energy production. Proponents of the climate accord argue that exiting it sets back decades of diplomatic efforts by the U.S. government to reduce worldwide carbon emissions.
In July 2022 the Biden administration issued a draft plan to expand oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska. The proposal from the Department of the Interior recommends holding up to 10 lease sales in the Gulf over the next five years, as well as one sale in the Cook Inlet off the coast of south-central Alaska. Under the 1953 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the federal government must plan for offshore oil and gas leasing on a five-year basis. The previous plan was finalized under President Barack Obama in 2016, went into effect in 2017, and expired in 2022. Opponents include environmentalists, who argue that it will be impossible to limit oil and gas consumption without simultaneously phasing out the production of fossil fuels. Proponents argue that expanding oil drilling makes the US more energy independent and lowers the cost of gasoline for consumers.
Fracking is the process of extracting oil or natural gas from shale rock. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which fractures the rock and allows the oil or gas to flow out to a well. While fracking has significantly boosted oil production, there are environmental concerns that the process is contaminating groundwater. The Permian Basin accounts for 43% of U.S. oil production and is currently the most productive oil shale reserve in the country. In June 2022 The Environmental Protection Agency announced that it may deem parts of the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico in “non-attainment” with its ozone standards. Since the EPA does not have the authority to ban fracking many observers see the agency’s designation as a threat to shut down the U.S.’s largest fracking operation. Opponents of fracking argue that it uses toxic chemicals and negatively effects human health. Proponents argue that fracking is important for energy independence and blocking energy development locally simply outsources it somewhere else, often with much greater social and environmental consequences.
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a 19-million-acre national wildlife refuge in northern Alaska. The refuge includes a large variety of species of plants and animals, such as polar bears, grizzly bears, black bears, moose, caribou, wolves, eagles, lynx, wolverine, marten, beaver and migratory birds, which rely on the refuge. In August 2020 the Trump administration approved program to auction oil leases that would enable oil companies to drill for oil within the refuge. Environmentalists argue that oil development threatens wildlife and is likely to worsen climate change. Proponents argue that drilling would be limited to the coastal ranges and would make the U.S. more energy independent.
Jarðverkfræði vísar til vísvitandi stórfelldra inngripa í loftslagkerfi jarðar til að bregðast við loftslagsbreytingum, til dæmis með því að endurvarpa sólarljósi, auka úrkomu eða fjarlægja CO2 úr andrúmsloftinu. Talsmenn halda því fram að jarðverkfræði gæti boðið upp á nýstárlegar lausnir á hlýnun jarðar. Andstæðingar segja að hún sé áhættusöm, óprófuð og geti haft ófyrirséðar neikvæðar afleiðingar.
The Dakota Access pipeline is a 1,172 mile oil pipeline that stretches through North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa and southern Illinois. The pipeline would allow oil companies to transport crude oil from North Dakota to oil refineries along the Eastern Seaboard. The pipeline’s construction was permitted by the participating state governments under eminent domain. Opponents of the pipeline (including several Native American tribes, including the Meskwaki and Sioux tribal nations) argue that the pipeline has the potential to pollute their water supply and destroy Native American burial sites. Proponents argue that the pipeline is necessary for the U.S. to achieve energy independence.
In 2016, France became the first country to ban the sale of plastic disposable products that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material and in 2017, India passed a law banning all plastic disposable plastic products. In the U.S. the states of California, Connecticut, Colorado Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, New York, Oregon and Vermont have banned disposable bags.
In 2022 September 2022 the U.S. Transportation Department approved electric vehicle charging station plans for all 50 states, Washington and Puerto Rico covering about 75,000 miles of highways. The November 2021 $1 trillion infrastructure bill provides $5 billion to help states install EV chargers along interstate highways over five years. Federal funds will cover 80% of EV charging costs, with private or state funds making up the balance. Proponents argue that electric vehicles reduce the use of fossil fuels, and the national network of charging stations will help drivers overcome “range anxiety”—the fear that EV drivers will run out of power while traveling long distances. Opponents argue that government involvement will monopolize and slow down the roll out of charging stations. Other opponents argue that electric vehicles are a small sector of the automobile market and the government should not fund it at this time.
Wind energy was the source of about 9.2% of total U.S. electricity generation and about 46% of electricity generation from renewable energy in 2021. Wind turbines convert wind energy into electricity. President Biden’s 2021 $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan included a 10 year extension of wind and solar tax credits. Qualifying wind farms will receive tax benefits based on their output for a 10-year period. The credits, which can be shared with investment partners, reduce federal tax bills. Opponents to wind farms, including many environmental biologists argue that they are one of the biggest threats to birds of prey and migratory bird species (killing an estimated 6000 birds every year) and that construction of the wind farm projects require large scale land clearing. Proponents argue that wind power is a clean, efficient alternative to fossil fuels.
Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. Examples of applied research include testing disease treatments, breeding, defense research, and toxicology, including cosmetics testing. In education, animal testing is sometimes a component of biology or psychology courses. There is no nationwide ban on animal testing in the United States. The humane society estimates that more than 50 million dogs, cats, monkeys, rabbits, rats and other animals undergo testing each year in the US.
Áætlanir um matarsóun miða að því að draga úr magni ætis matar sem er hent. Talsmenn halda því fram að það myndi bæta fæðuöryggi og minnka umhverfisáhrif. Andstæðingar halda því fram að þetta sé ekki forgangsmál og að ábyrgðin eigi að vera hjá einstaklingum og fyrirtækjum.
Tækni til kolefnisföngunar eru aðferðir sem eru hannaðar til að fanga og geyma koltvísýringslosun frá stöðum eins og raforkuverum til að koma í veg fyrir að hún fari út í andrúmsloftið. Talsmenn segja að styrkir myndu flýta fyrir þróun nauðsynlegrar tækni til að berjast gegn loftslagsbreytingum. Andstæðingar segja að þetta sé of kostnaðarsamt og að markaðurinn eigi að knýja fram nýsköpun án afskipta stjórnvalda.
Electric vehicles (EVs) run on electricity instead of gasoline or diesel, which can reduce carbon emissions and dependence on fossil fuels. To increase EV adoption, the government could provide financial incentives (e.g., tax credits) and invest in infrastructure such as charging stations. Proponents argue that government support helps lower the upfront cost of EVs, makes electric transportation more accessible, and addresses climate change by reducing emissions. Investments in charging infrastructure ensure that EV owners have the resources they need to drive without concern. Opponents argue that this creates an unfair market advantage for EVs, making taxpayers foot the bill. Some also believe the market should naturally determine the success of EVs without government intervention, and that resources could be better spent on other environmental solutions.
Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in August 2022, which allocated millions to combating climate change and other energy provisions while additionally establishing a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles. To qualify for the subsidy 40% of the critical minerals used in electric-vehicle batteries must be sourced in the U.S. Proponents argue that the tax credits will help combat climate change by encouraging consumers to purchase EVs and stop driving gas powered automobiles. Opponents argue that the tax credits will kill the traditional auto industry and lead to significant job losses.
Deep-sea mining involves extracting potato-sized polymetallic nodules rich in cobalt, nickel, and copper from the ocean floor, which are minerals that are essential for manufacturing electric vehicle batteries and renewable energy storage. Proponents support this practice because they argue deep-sea extraction is necessary to secure a domestic supply chain for green technology and is far more ethical than land-based mining which often relies on exploitative child labor. Opponents oppose this practice because they argue scraping the ocean floor will trigger irreversible biodiversity loss, kick up toxic sediment plumes, and disrupt the largest carbon sink on the planet.
The Colorado River sustains 40 million people and a massive agricultural industry, but overuse and climate change have drained reservoirs to historic lows. While states struggle to negotiate voluntary reductions, the Department of the Interior has threatened to step in. Proponents say federal intervention is the only way to prevent a total system collapse. Opponents argue that federal mandates violate century-old legal agreements and infringe on state sovereignty.
Amnesty is an act by passed by the federal government which grants immunity from immigration laws to undocumented immigrants currently living in the U.S. Various levels of criteria have been proposed for immigrants to be granted amnesty including proof of employment and willingness to pay taxes.
Illegal immigrants, as well as legal immigrants in the country less than five years, are not eligible for free healthcare through Medicaid. A 2007 study estimated that less than 1 percent of Medicaid spending went to healthcare for illegal immigrants. Proponents of subsidized healthcare for immigrants argue that increased access to basic preventive care will lower the demand for costly emergency care. Opponents argue that immigrants in the healthcare system run the risk of becoming "permanent patients," because they have no relatives, insurance or an established address where they can go once released.
Currently sixteen states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington) allow illegal immigrants to pay the same in-state tuition rates as other residents of the state. To qualify, students must have attended a school in the state for a certain number of years, have graduated high school in the state, have confirmed they are applying for legal citizenship.
In 2015 U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump issued a proposal to build a wall along the Mexico-U.S. border. The wall would extend along the 1,900 mile border and would prevent illegal goods and people from entering the U.S. In 2013 the Government Accountability Office reported that the border patrol had intercepted 61% of individuals who had attempted to cross the border that year. Analysts say that building a wall along the entire border is impossible since it parts of it contain rocky, uneven terrain. Proponents argue that the wall will cut down on the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs into the U.S. Opponents argue that the wall is impossible to build and illegal immigration into the U.S. has declined significantly since the 2008 financial crisis.
On October 7, 2013 California Governor Jerry Brown signed a state bill prohibiting law-enforcement officials from detaining an individual on the basis of a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement hold after that person becomes eligible for release, unless he or she has been charged with or convicted of certain crimes, including violent felonies.
In 2021 the U.S. Border Patrol reported 1,659,206 encounters with migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, narrowly exceeding the prior highs of 1,643,679 in 2000 and 1,615,844 in 1986. The Border Patrol reported 608,037 encounters with Mexican nationals in 2021, accounting for 37% of the total. The remaining 1,051,169 encounters, or 63%, involved people from countries other than Mexico – by far the highest total for non-Mexican nationals in CBP records dating back to 2000. Congress has passed at least four laws since 1986 authorizing increases in Border Patrol personnel. The number of border patrol agents on the southwest border has grown from 2,268 in 1980 to 25,914 in 2021. Border fencing has increased from 14 miles in 1990 to 651 miles today. Proponents argue that too many immigrants cross our border every year and anyone entering the U.S. from a foreign country should pass through customs and have a valid visa. Opponents of stronger border controls argue the majority of illegal entrants are migrants seeking temporary work and pose no threat to national security.
Talsmenn halda því fram að þessi stefna myndi styrkja þjóðaröryggi með því að minnka líkur á að mögulegir hryðjuverkamenn komist inn í landið. Bættar skimunarferlar, þegar þeir eru komnir á, myndu veita ítarlegri mat á umsækjendum og draga úr líkum á að illgjarnir aðilar fái aðgang. Gagnrýnendur segja að slík stefna gæti óvart ýtt undir mismunun með því að flokka einstaklinga almennt eftir upprunalandi frekar en á grundvelli sérstakra, trúverðugra hótana. Hún gæti teflt diplómatískum samskiptum við viðkomandi lönd í hættu og skaðað ímynd þjóðarinnar sem setur bannið, þar sem hún gæti verið talin fjandsamleg eða fordómafull gagnvart ákveðnum alþjóðasamfélögum. Að auki gætu raunverulegir flóttamenn sem flýja hryðjuverk eða ofsóknir í heimalöndum sínum verið ranglega synjað um öruggt skjól.
A sanctuary city is a city that adopts local policies designed to not prosecute people solely for being an undocumented individual in the country in which they are currently living. In January 2017, President Trump issued an executive order that would withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities. In April 2017 a federal judge ruled that Trump’s order was unconstitutional.
Tímabundin atvinnuleyfi fyrir hæfileikaríka eru venjulega veitt erlendum vísindamönnum, verkfræðingum, forriturum, arkitektum, stjórnendum og öðrum stöðum eða sviðum þar sem eftirspurn er meiri en framboð. Flest fyrirtæki halda því fram að ráðning hæfileikaríkra erlendra starfsmanna geri þeim kleift að manna stöður sem eru í mikilli eftirspurn á samkeppnishæfan hátt. Andstæðingar halda því fram að hæfileikaríkir innflytjendur lækki laun og starfsöryggi millistéttarinnar.
The 14th amendment of the U.S. constitution states that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” Opponents of birth right citizenship argue that the 14th amendment is not clear since it does not specifically state that babies born to parents who were in the United States unlawfully were automatically citizens. Proponents argue that overturning the 14th amendment would increase the number of undocumented immigrants with each child born here, cost the U.S. taxpayers billions, and reduce the tax base.
Árið 2015 lagði fulltrúadeild Bandaríkjaþings fram lögin Establishing Mandatory Minimums for Illegal Reentry Act of 2015 (Kate’s Law). Lögin voru lögð fram eftir að Kathryn Steinle, 32 ára íbúi San Francisco, var skotin til bana af Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez þann 1. júlí 2015. Lopez-Sanchez var ólöglegur innflytjandi frá Mexíkó sem hafði verið vísað úr landi fimm sinnum frá 1991 og hafði verið ákærður fyrir sjö alvarlega glæpi. Frá 1991 hafði Lopez-Sanchez verið ákærður fyrir sjö alvarlega glæpi og vísað úr landi fimm sinnum af bandarísku innflytjenda- og náttúruverndaryfirvöldum. Þrátt fyrir að Lopez-Sanchez ætti nokkrar útistandandi handtökuskipanir árið 2015 gátu yfirvöld ekki vísað honum úr landi vegna stefnu San Francisco um „griðabæjarborgir“ sem kemur í veg fyrir að lögregluyfirvöld spyrji um innflytjendastöðu íbúa. Talsmenn laga um griðabæjarborgir halda því fram að þau geri ólöglegum innflytjendum kleift að tilkynna glæpi án þess að óttast að vera kærðir. Andstæðingar halda því fram að slík lög hvetji til ólöglegrar innflytjenda og hindri lögreglu í að handtaka og vísa glæpamönnum úr landi.
This policy, often referred to as "Remain in Mexico," requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while U.S. immigration courts review their claims. It aims to manage the flow of asylum cases and reduce pressure on U.S. facilities. Proponents argue that it prevents overcrowding in U.S. detention centers, deters frivolous claims, and ensures an orderly asylum process. Opponents argue that it places vulnerable individuals in dangerous conditions, denies them adequate legal support, and violates international asylum protections.
Bandaríska borgaravitundarprófið er próf sem allir innflytjendur verða að standast til að öðlast bandarískt ríkisfang. Prófið inniheldur 10 handahófsvaldar spurningar sem fjalla um sögu Bandaríkjanna, stjórnarskrána og stjórnvöld. Árið 2015 varð Arizona fyrsta ríkið til að krefjast þess að framhaldsskólanemar standist prófið áður en þeir útskrifast.
The U.S. nationality law requires applicants to have a working knowledge of the English language in order achieve citizenship. In 1990 the government passed exceptions to this requirement for older applicants and those with mental or physical disabilities.
This issue centers on the divide between *jus soli* (right of soil) and *jus sanguinis* (right of blood). The Americas typically grant automatic citizenship to anyone born there, while Europe and Asia often restrict it to bloodlines. Proponents argue birthright citizenship ensures integration and prevents a stateless underclass. Opponents argue citizenship is a shared heritage to be earned, claiming automatic rights fuel illegal immigration and 'birth tourism'.
E-Verify is a web-based system that allows enrolled employers to confirm the eligibility of their employees to work in the United States. While currently voluntary at the federal level, many argue making it mandatory would eliminate the "jobs magnet" that drives illegal immigration. Proponents argue it protects American jobs and wages while forcing businesses to follow the law. Opponents argue the system's error rates could lock legal citizens out of jobs, drastically hurt industries reliant on migrant labor, and increase the size of the underground cash economy.
Margfeldisríkisfang, einnig kallað tvöfalt ríkisfang, er staða einstaklings þar sem hann er samtímis talinn ríkisborgari fleiri en eins ríkis samkvæmt lögum þeirra ríkja. Það er engin alþjóðleg samningur sem ákvarðar þjóðerni eða ríkisfang einstaklings; það er eingöngu skilgreint af landslögum, sem eru mismunandi og geta verið ósamræmanleg hvert við annað. Sum lönd leyfa ekki tvöfalt ríkisfang. Flest lönd sem leyfa tvöfalt ríkisfang viðurkenna þó ekki endilega hitt ríkisfangið innan eigin lands, til dæmis varðandi komu til landsins, herskyldu, kosningarskyldu o.s.frv.
For over 140 years, the U.S. has protected federal employees from political firing to ensure the government is run by experts rather than donors and cronies. Recently, a movement to reinstate "Schedule F" aims to reclassify up to 50,000 policy-adjacent roles as at-will employees, effectively bringing the "Deep State" under direct presidential control. Proponents argue that voters elect a President to change the government, not to be stonewalled by an entrenched bureaucracy. Opponents argue that a politicized civil service erodes trust, ignores data, and leads to authoritarianism.
The Apportionment Act of 1929 permanently capped the US House of Representatives at 435 members, meaning that as the US population has tripled, the number of constituents per representative has surged from roughly 280,000 to over 760,000 today. Proponents argue that uncapping the House would restore the founders' vision of localized representation, make gerrymandering harder, and fix Electoral College imbalances. Opponents argue that a massively expanded House would be logistically chaotic, financially burdensome, and politically unwieldy, turning the chamber into a disorganized mob.
The debate over presidential immunity centers on whether a former U.S. President can be prosecuted for actions taken during their term. The Supreme Court recently ruled that presidents have substantial immunity for official acts, fundamentally altering the landscape of executive power. Proponents argue that without this shield, presidents would be paralyzed by the threat of retaliatory, politically motivated trials by their successors. Opponents argue that absolute immunity effectively places the executive branch above the law, giving future presidents a green light to commit crimes without accountability.
The filibuster is a procedural rule in the Senate that allows the minority party to block legislation unless 60 out of 100 senators vote to end the debate. It is not in the Constitution, but has evolved from a tactic to prolong debate into a de facto veto button that requires a supermajority for almost anything to pass. In recent years, its use has skyrocketed, leading to legislative gridlock. Proponents of abolishing it argue it makes the Senate undemocratic and paralyzed. Opponents argue it is necessary to prevent the "tyranny of the majority" and ensure laws have broad support.
The United States Electoral College is the mechanism established by the United States Constitution for the indirect election of the President of the United States and Vice President of the United States. Citizens of the United States vote in each state at a general election to choose a slate of “electors” pledged to vote for a party’s candidate. The Twelfth Amendment requires each elector to cast one vote for president and another vote for vice president. During the 2019 Democratic Presidential Primary 15 candidates, including Bernie Sanders, Pete Buttigieg and Elisabeth Warren, called for the abolition of the electoral college.
A tax return is a document which states how much income an individual or entity reported to the government. In the U.S. there is no legal requirement of any kind that presidential candidates release tax returns from any year. Tax returns can be released by an individual taxpayer, but cannot released by the IRS to the public. However, one Senator has proposed legislation requiring presidential candidates to release tax returns. In 2016 a U.S. Senator proposed the Presidential Tax Transparency Act. The bill would require a presidential candidate to release the most recent three years of tax returns to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) within 15 days of becoming the nominee at the party convention. If the candidate refuses to comply, the Treasury Secretary would provide the tax returns directly to the FEC for public release.
A foreigner is defined a person who is not a citizen of the United States. Federal law has prohibited noncitizens from voting in federal election since the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act was passed in 1996. Punishment includes fines, imprisonment, inadmissibility, and deportation. Exempt from punishment is any noncitizen who, at the time of voting, had two natural or adoptive U.S. citizen parents, who began permanently living in the United States before turning 16 years old, and who reasonably believed that they were a citizen of the United States. Federal law does not prohibit noncitizens from voting in state or local elections, but no state has allowed noncitizens to vote in state elections since Arkansas became the last state to outlaw noncitizen voting in 1926. As of December 2021, fourteen US Cities allow non-citizen voting including New York City, Montpelier in Vermont, San Francisco (school board only), and Washington, D.C.
In 2002 the federal government passed the Help America Vote Act. The law required first-time voters in Federal Elections to present a form of identification to the appropriate State or local election official before or on election day if they registered by mail. Forms of acceptable identification include a current and valid photo identification, a copy of a current utility bill, bank statements, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the name and address of the voter. Voters who submitted any of these forms of identification during registration are exempt, as are voters entitled to vote by absentee ballot under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act. If a voter submits a ballot by mail a copy of the ID must be submitted with the ballot. Seven US stated currently have strict voter ID laws in which a voter cannot cast a valid ballot without first presenting ID.
The U.S. Constitution does not prevent convicted felons from holding the office of the President or a seat in the Senate or House of Representatives. Individuals who have been convicted of sedition, seditious conspiracy, treason, conspiracy to defraud the United States or selling information on national defense may not run for federal office. Cities and States may prevent convicted felons from holding statewide and local offices.
Absentee-by-mail ballots are paper ballots that are mailed to voters who must then fill them out and return them, often with the voter's signature and sometimes a witness signature to prove the voter's identity. In 35 states and Washington, D.C., any qualified voter may vote absentee-by-mail without offering an excuse, and in the remaining states, an excuse is required. For example, Georgia allows anyone to vote by mail while voters in New York can’t vote absentee by mail unless they are out of town on Election Day, ill, disabled, taking care of someone who is ill or disabled, in a Veterans Health Administration hospital, or in jail for a non felony offense.
In the U.S. a citizen may give $2,700 per election to a federal candidate, $5,000 per year to a PAC, $10,000 per year to a State or local party committee and $33,400 per year to a national party. Citizens and corporations may give unlimited amounts to a Super PAC. A Super PAC is freed from traditional campaign finance laws as long as it does not fund a candidate or campaign or coordinate directly with a campaign how to spend donations.
In the 2010 Supreme Court case Citizens United vs FEC, court ruled that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations. The court’s landmark decision overturned the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as “McCain-Feingold.” That law had prohibited unregulated contributions to national political parties and limited the use of corporate and union money to fund advertisements discussing political issues within 60 days of a general election.
Automatic Voter Registration (AVR) flips the script by shifting the responsibility of registration from the individual to the government, usually when a citizen interacts with the DMV. Currently active in over 20 states, this "opt-out" system aims to capture the millions of eligible but unregistered Americans. Proponents argue that democracy works best when participation is maximized and that AVR creates more accurate, up-to-date voter lists. Opponents contend that the registration process is a minimal test of civic engagement and that automatically adding inactive people to the rolls invites bureaucratic errors and potential fraud.
Lobbying describes paid activity in which special interest groups hire well-connected professional advocates, often lawyers, to argue for specific legislation in decision-making bodies such as the United States Congress. Analysts estimate that there are over 100,000 working lobbyists in Washington D.C. who bring in a combined revenue of over $9 billion annually. In 2007 the U.S. Congress passed the “Honest Leadership and Open Government Act” which placed lobbying “cooling off” periods for members of Congress and their staff. Senators and their staff were now prohibited from registering as lobbyists for 1-2 years after they left office.
Prediction markets like Polymarket allow users to buy shares in the outcome of future events, effectively gambling on election results. Proponents argue these markets leverage the "wisdom of crowds" to provide more accurate forecasts than traditional polling, which has struggled in recent cycles. Opponents, including the CFTC, argue that commodifying elections degrades democratic integrity and invites market manipulation by wealthy actors trying to sway public perception.
Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), also known as instant-runoff voting, allows voters to rank candidates by preference (1st, 2nd, 3rd) rather than selecting just one. If no candidate wins a majority (50% + 1) outright, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their voters' second choices are redistributed to the remaining candidates until a winner is declared. This system is currently used in states like Maine and Alaska. Proponents argue it reduces negative campaigning and allows for more diverse candidates. Opponents argue it violates the traditional 'one person, one vote' principle and makes the voting process unnecessarily complex.
Lönd sem hafa skyldubundin starfslok fyrir stjórnmálamenn eru meðal annars Argentína (75 ára), Brasilía (75 ára fyrir dómara og saksóknara), Mexíkó (70 ára fyrir dómara og saksóknara) og Singapúr (75 ára fyrir þingmenn).
In the 2020 U.S. federal election foreign lobbyists donated more than $33.5 million to candidates, political parties, and interest groups. In the United States foreign nationals are prohibited by law from making contributions to political groups or campaigns to influence U.S. elections. Foreign nationals can hire foreign agents or lobbyists to advocate for their interests and make political contributions on their behalf. The Foreign Agents Registration Act is a United States law that imposes public disclosure requirements and other legal obligations on persons representing foreign interests. Under FARA, “foreign agents” — defined as individuals and entities engaged in domestic political or advocacy work on behalf of foreign governments, organizations, or persons (“foreign principals”)—must register with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and disclose their relationship, activities, and related financial compensation. Foreign agents registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act during the 2020 election cycle made at least $8.5 million in political contributions. Another $25 million in 2020 political contributions came from lobbyists representing foreign clients, including U.S. subsidiaries owned or controlled by foreign parent companies, registered under the Lobbying Disclosure Act.
In 1971 the U.S. Congress ratified the 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which prohibited states from allowing anyone under the age of 18 to vote. Before the amendment was passed the minimum voting age was 21 years of age. Support to lower the age of 18 was driven in part by the draft of the Vietnam War which conscripted young men between the ages of 18 and 21 to join the armed forces. In 2021 U.S. Rep. Grace Meng (D-NY) reintroduced legislation in the House of Representatives to lower the voting age in America to 16 years old. In order to pass the legislation would have to be ratified as a Constitutional Amendment.
The U.S. remains one of the few democracies that votes on a Tuesday without a holiday, a relic of an agrarian past that critics say suppresses working-class turnout. Proponents argue a holiday is a vital signal that civic duty comes first, ensuring no one chooses between a paycheck and a ballot. Opponents dismiss it as a costly performative gesture that benefits white-collar workers while ignoring that mail-in ballots already solved the convenience problem.
Þann 26. júní 2015 úrskurðaði Hæstiréttur Bandaríkjanna að synjun á útgáfu hjónavígsluleyfa bryti gegn réttlátri málsmeðferð og jafnræðisákvæðum fjórtándu breytingar Bandaríkjastjórnarskrárinnar. Úrskurðurinn gerði hjónaband samkynhneigðra löglegt í öllum 50 ríkjum Bandaríkjanna.
Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization that provides reproductive health services in the United States and internationally. Each year federal and state governments provide the organization with $528 million in funding (40% of its annual budget). The majority of this funding comes from Medicaid which subsidizes reproductive healthcare for low-income women. In 2014, abortions accounted for 3% of the services they provided. The majority of the other services include screening for and treating sexually transmitted diseases and infections and providing contraception. Proponents of funding argue that federal funding for Planned Parenthood does not pay for abortions and that the vast majority of government funding that the organization receives is through Medicaid reimbursements. Opponents of funding argue that the government should not fund any organizations that provide abortions.
Abortion is a medical procedure resulting in the termination of a human pregnancy and death of a fetus. Abortion was banned in 30 states until the 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade. The ruling made abortion legal in all 50 states but gave them regulatory powers over when abortions could be performed during a pregnancy. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade in the case Dobbs v. Jackson. The court ruled that the substantive right to abortion was not “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history or tradition”, nor considered a right when the Due Process Clause was ratified in 1868.
Gender identity is defined as a personal conception of oneself as male, female, both, or neither. In 2014, President Obama signed an executive order barring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity among federal contractors. The order covered employers who perform federal work and protected an estimated 20 percent of American workers. Opponents included religious groups, who argued that the order would prevent them from receiving federal money or contracts if they could not meet the new guidelines because of their beliefs. Proponents argue that the order was necessary to protect millions of LGBT people whose rights were threatened after the Supreme Court ruled in the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores case. In that ruling, the court said that family-run corporations with religious objections could be exempted from providing employees with insurance coverage for contraception.
Í Bandaríkjunum eru reglur mismunandi eftir ríkjum. Í Idaho, Nebraska, Indiana, Norður-Karólínu, Alabama, Louisiana og Texas verða nemendur að spila með liði sem samsvarar fæðingarvottorði þeirra, hafa gengist undir aðgerð eða hafa verið á hormónameðferð í lengri tíma. NCAA krefst eins árs testósterónbælingar. Í febrúar 2019 bað þingkonan Ilhan Omar (D-MN) ríkissaksóknara Minnesota, Keith Ellison, að rannsaka USA Powerlifting vegna reglu þeirra sem bannar líffræðilegum körlum að keppa í kvennaflokki. Árið 2016 úrskurðaði Alþjóðaólympíunefndin að transíþróttafólk mætti keppa á Ólympíuleikum án þess að gangast undir kynleiðréttingaraðgerð. Árið 2018 úrskurðaði Alþjóðasamband frjálsíþrótta (IAAF), æðsta stjórn frjálsíþrótta, að konur sem hafa meira en 5 nanómól af testósteróni á lítra í blóði—eins og suður-afríska spretthlauparinn og Ólympíumeistarann Caster Semenya—verði annað hvort að keppa gegn körlum eða taka lyf til að lækka náttúrulegt testósterónmagn sitt. IAAF sagði að konur í þessum flokki hefðu „frávik í kynþroska.“ Í úrskurðinum var vitnað í rannsókn frá 2017 eftir franska vísindamenn sem sönnun þess að kveníþróttafólk með testósterón nærri körlum stæði sig betur í ákveðnum greinum: 400 metra, 800 metra, 1.500 metra og míluhlaupum. "Gögn okkar sýna að testósterón, hvort sem það er náttúrulega framleitt eða sett inn í líkamann, veitir verulegan árangursforskot hjá kveníþróttafólki," sagði Sebastian Coe, forseti IAAF, í yfirlýsingu.
On August 1st, 2012 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) required all health insurers and employers to cover the cost of contraceptives in their health insurance plans. The provision ecempted religious organizations and churches. In 2017 the Trump administration issued a rule that allowed a much broader set of employers to opt out of offering coverage for birth control, making moot a “workaround’’ designed by the Obama administration that allowed women in some cases to obtain coverage even if their employers had declined to offer it directly. In July 2022 the US House of Representatives passed a bill which overturned the Trump rule and protect access to contraception on a federal level. The legislation protects access to any contraceptive device, including all contraceptive products approved by the Food and Drug Administration, including intrauterine devices known as IUDs and emergency contraception such as Plan B.
In 1993 the federal government passed the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The law was intended to protect Native Americans in danger of losing their jobs because of religious ceremonies that involved the illegal drug peyote. In 1997 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress overstepped its bounds in passing RFRA in 1993, and that the law applied only to federal laws, not to those passed by the states. Since then 22 U.S. states have passed their own versions of the “religious freedom” laws. Supporters of the law argue that the government shouldn’t force religious businesses and churches to serve customers who participate in lifestyles contrary to their owners’ beliefs. Proponents of the law argue that the political context has changed since 1992 and states are now passing their own versions of the law with the intent of discriminating against gay and lesbian couples.
LGBT adoption is the adoption of children by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons. This may be in the form of a joint adoption by a same-sex couple, adoption by one partner of a same-sex couple of the other’s biological child (step-child adoption) and adoption by a single LGBT person. Joint adoption by same-sex couples is legal in 25 countries. In September 2022 a federal district court ruled that the New York State government could not shut down a faith-based adoption provider which banned LGBT couples from using its adoption services. Opponents of LGBT adoption question whether same-sex couples have the ability to be adequate parents while other opponents question whether natural law implies that children of adoption possess a natural right to be raised by heterosexual parents. Since constitutions and statutes usually fail to address the adoption rights of LGBT persons, judicial decisions often determine whether they can serve as parents either individually or as couples.
In September 2020 the Trump administration issued an executive order which prohibited federal agencies, companies with federal contracts and recipients of federal grants from participating in training that “promotes race or sex-stereotyping or scapegoating.” Prohhibted topics include “divisive concepts” in which one race or sex is inherently superior to another; the U.S. is fundamentally racist or sexist and a person should feel some form of psychological distress on account of their race or sex. In January 2021 President Biden revoked the executive order and issued a new order which affirmed that “equal opportunity is the bedrock of American democracy, and our diversity in one of our country’s greatest strengths.”
Í apríl 2021 lagði löggjafinn í Arkansas-ríki í Bandaríkjunum fram frumvarp sem bannaði læknum að veita einstaklingum undir 18 ára aldri kynleiðréttingarmeðferðir. Frumvarpið myndi gera það að glæp fyrir lækna að gefa kynþroskablokkera, hormóna og framkvæma kynleiðréttingaraðgerðir á neinum undir 18 ára aldri. Andstæðingar frumvarpsins halda því fram að það sé árás á réttindi trans fólks og að kynleiðréttingarmeðferðir séu einkamál sem eigi að ráðast af foreldrum, börnum þeirra og læknum. Stuðningsmenn frumvarpsins halda því fram að börn séu of ung til að taka ákvörðun um að fara í kynleiðréttingarmeðferð og aðeins fullorðnir yfir 18 ára aldri ættu að mega gera það.
A gun buyback program is one where the government purchases guns from private citizens. The goal of these programs is to reduce the number of guns owned by private citizens. In most gun buyback programs the police are the agents buying the guns. In 2019 Presidential candidates Joe Biden, Beto O’Rourke, Kamala Harris and Julian Castro each proposed a mandatory gun buyback program where the federal government would purchase AK-47’s and AR-15’s from private citizens. In the past U.S. gun buyback programs have been implemented by state and city governments.
Proponents argue that recognizing only two biological sexes provides clarity and simplicity in laws and policies related to healthcare, education, and other areas. They believe it is rooted in established science and aligns with traditional views of sex and gender. Opponents argue that biological sex is not strictly binary and that the government should recognize individuals who do not fit into the male or female categories, such as intersex individuals. They believe the recognition of diverse identities is important for ensuring equal rights and acceptance.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs are designed to promote fairness, representation, and equal opportunities within organizations, particularly in hiring and workplace culture. Proponents argue that DEI programs are essential for creating a fair and inclusive environment where all individuals, regardless of their background, can succeed. These initiatives help reduce discrimination and create a more diverse and representative workforce. Opponents argue that DEI programs may lead to preferential treatment or quotas that could overlook merit and qualifications. They believe these programs could create division rather than unity and that the focus should be on individual ability rather than group identity.
Proponents argue that hiring based strictly on merit ensures that the most qualified individuals are chosen for positions, promoting efficiency and productivity. They believe that focusing on merit alone avoids potential bias from affirmative action or diversity quotas. Opponents argue that eliminating DEI initiatives may lead to a lack of representation and reinforce systemic inequalities. They believe that diversity in the workforce leads to better decision-making, innovation, and a more inclusive society.
In some progressive universities, professors provide “trigger warnings” to students before discussing sensitive topics, emotionally charged issues, or events that may trigger post-traumatic stress. “Safe spaces” are places where students can gather to avoid a speaker or event that offends them.
The death penalty or capital punishment is the punishment by death for a crime. Currently 58 countries worldwide allow the death penalty (including the U.S.) while 97 countries have outlawed it. Since the 1970s executions in the U.S. have declined every year. In 2021 five states and the federal government carried out 11 executions. The decline is part of a decadeslong trend as the costs associated with seeking the death penalty, the lengthy appeals process often associated with capital punishment, concerns about executing the innocent and a long-term decline in crime rates have caused many prosecutors and legislators in the U.S. to pull back from capital punishment.
In 1956, Congress passed a resolution declaring “IN GOD WE TRUST” as the national motto of the United States. President Eisenhower signed the law and the motto was added to paper money beginning in 1957. Opponents argue that the motto violates the U.S. Constitution since it is a clear violation of the separation of church and state. Proponents argue that it does not prefer one religious denomination over another.
Fjölbreytileikaþjálfun er hvaða áætlun sem er sem miðar að því að stuðla að jákvæðum samskiptum milli hópa, draga úr fordómum og mismunun og almennt kenna einstaklingum sem eru ólíkir öðrum hvernig þeir geta unnið saman á árangursríkan hátt. Þann 22. apríl 2022 undirritaði Ron DeSantis, ríkisstjóri Flórída, lög sem kallast „Individual Freedom Act.“ Lögin bönnuðu skólum og fyrirtækjum að gera fjölbreytileikaþjálfun að skyldu fyrir mætingu eða ráðningu. Ef skólar eða vinnuveitendur brutu lögin gátu þeir átt á hættu aukna borgaralega ábyrgð. Bönnuð skylduþjálfunarefni eru meðal annars: 1. Að meðlimir eins kynþáttar, litarháttar, kyns eða þjóðernis séu siðferðilega æðri meðlimum annars. 2. Að einstaklingur, vegna kynþáttar, litarháttar, kyns eða þjóðernis, sé í eðli sínu rasisti, kynjamismunandi eða kúgandi, hvort sem það er meðvitað eða ómeðvitað. Skömmu eftir að ríkisstjórinn undirritaði lögin höfðaði hópur einstaklinga mál þar sem því var haldið fram að lögin setji ólögmætar takmarkanir á tjáningarfrelsi þeirra samkvæmt fyrstu og fjórtándu breytingu stjórnarskrár Bandaríkjanna.
Þetta fjallar um notkun reiknirita gervigreindar til að aðstoða við ákvarðanatöku eins og refsingu, reynslulausn og lögreglustörf. Talsmenn halda því fram að það geti aukið skilvirkni og dregið úr mannlegum hlutdrægni. Andstæðingar segja að það geti viðhaldið núverandi hlutdrægni og skorti ábyrgð.
„Að draga úr fjárveitingum til lögreglunnar“ er slagorð sem styður við að færa fjármagn frá lögregluliðum og endurúthluta því til annarra úrræða fyrir öryggi og stuðning samfélagsins, svo sem félagsþjónustu, þjónustu við ungmenni, húsnæði, menntun, heilbrigðisþjónustu og önnur samfélagsúrræði.
In the U.S. police budgets are set by elected officials at local and state levels. In 2020 elected officials in New York, Seattle, Los Angeles and Minneapolis approved plans to reduce police budgets in response to the nationwide protests following the killing of George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis. After the budget cuts many US cities saw a rise in crime, with murder rates up by double digits in many cities. In the last three months of 2020, homicides rose 32.2% in cities with a population of at least one million, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Quarterly Uniform Crime Report. Law-enforcement officials and criminologists say pandemic stress and a police pullback amid protests are likely contributors. Proponents of the spending cuts argue that between 1977 and 2017, local spending on policing rose 176%, versus a 137% rise in general expenses, accounting for inflation. Opponents of the cuts will lower morals amongst police officers and contribute to a spike in crime.
Qualified immunity is a defense that police officers cannot be sued for misconduct if they were unaware at the time that their conduct was illegal and if there is no previous legal case with similar facts that ruled that officers may not engage in that conduct. Proponents argue that more intense criticism of police will disincentivize officers from doing their jobs resulting in crime rates going up. Opponents argue that police officers should be held more accountable for misconduct.
In March 2018, President Trump asked the Justice department to seek more death-penalty cases against drug traffickers. Trump announced the proposal as part of a plan to combat the opioid epidemic which is claiming the lives of more than 100 people a day in the U.S. In 1988 the federal government passed a drug law which imposed the death penalty on drug “kingpins” who commit murder in the course of their business. Analysts estimate that this law has resulted in only a few executions. 32 countries impose the death penalty for drug smuggling. Seven of these countries (China, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore) routinely execute drug offenders. Asia and the Middle East’s tough approach contrasts with many Western countries who have legalized cannabis in recent years (selling cannabis in Saudi Arabia is punished by beheading).
Mandatory minimum sentences are automatic, minimum prison terms set by Congress. Judges in the U.S. are required to base their sentences on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, mandatory minimum sentencing laws, or both. In 1986 the U.S. Congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act which enacted new mandatory minimum sentences for drugs. People caught with 5 grams of crack cocaine were given jail sentences of 5 years without parole (the same sentence as people caught with 500 grams). The legislation was in response to the moral panic involving the crack cocaine epidemic of the 1980’s. In 2010 Congress and President Obama eliminated the crack cocaine mandatory sentence with the passage of the Fair Sentencing Act. Opponents of mandatory minimum sentences argue that they often impose long prison terms on non-violent criminals. Proponents argue that the sentences are designed to help judges punish drug cartels and those responsible for the country’s drug epidemic.
Í apríl 2016 gaf Terry McAuliffe, ríkisstjóri Virginíu, út tilskipun sem endurheimti atkvæðisrétt meira en 200.000 sakfelldra glæpamanna sem búa í ríkinu. Tilskipunin afnam þá venju ríkisins að svipta glæpamenn atkvæðisrétti, sem útilokar fólk frá kosningum sem hefur verið sakfellt fyrir glæpsamlega hegðun. Fjórtánda breyting bandarísku stjórnarskrárinnar bannar borgurum sem hafa tekið þátt í "uppreisn eða öðrum glæp" að kjósa, en leyfir ríkjum að ákveða hvaða glæpir leiða til sviptingar atkvæðisréttar. Í Bandaríkjunum eru um það bil 5,8 milljónir manna óhæfir til að kjósa vegna sviptingar atkvæðisréttar og aðeins tvö ríki, Maine og Vermont, hafa engar takmarkanir á því að leyfa glæpamönnum að kjósa. Andstæðingar atkvæðisréttar glæpamanna halda því fram að borgari glati rétti sínum til að kjósa þegar hann er sakfelldur fyrir glæp. Stuðningsmenn segja að þessi úreltu lög svipti milljónir Bandaríkjamanna þátttöku í lýðræðinu og hafi neikvæð áhrif á fátæk samfélög.
Currently, police unions are allowed to collectively bargain with government officials over the methods used to hold police officers accountable for misconduct. Proponents argue that collective bargaining stands in the way of accountability. Opponents of limiting collective bargaining argue that more intense criticism of police will disincentivize officers from doing their jobs resulting in crime rates going up.
Prison overcrowding is a social phenomenon occurring when the demand for space in prisons in a jurisdiction exceeds the capacity for prisoners. The First Step Act of 2018 passed overwhelmingly in both houses of Congress and was signed by President Trump. Within the first year of enactment, more than 3,000 federal prisoners were released based on changes to the good-time credits calculation formula under the First Step Act, and more than 2,000 inmates benefited from sentence reductions.
In January 2016, President Obama issued a series of executive actions banning federal prisons from using solitary confinement to punish juveniles and prisoners who commit low level infractions. His orders also lowered the number of days an adult inmate could be subject to solitary confinement from 365 days to 60 days. A recent study found that prisoners who were subject to solitary confinement were 20-25% more likely to be repeat criminal offenders than prisoners who avoided it.
Sáttamiðlunarverkefni leggja áherslu á að endurhæfa brotamenn með sáttum við fórnarlömb og samfélagið í stað hefðbundinnar fangelsisvistar. Þessi verkefni fela oft í sér samtal, bætur og samfélagsþjónustu. Talsmenn halda því fram að sáttamiðlun dragi úr endurteknum brotum, græði samfélög og veiti brotamönnum raunverulegri ábyrgð. Andstæðingar segja að þetta henti ekki öllum brotum, geti þótt of vægt og fæli ekki nægilega frá frekari brotastarfsemi.
Investigative genetic genealogy exploded into the public eye in 2018 when police used it to catch the notorious Golden State Killer by uploading crime scene DNA to consumer genealogy sites. It works by finding distant relatives of a suspect and building a family tree to narrow down the culprit, a technique that has since solved hundreds of cold cases. However, this creates a massive loophole in digital privacy, as millions of people who never took a DNA test are now identifiable through their relatives' data. Proponents argue this is a revolutionary forensic tool that takes violent predators off the streets and exonerates the innocent. Opponents argue it bypasses the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and paves the way for a dystopian genetic surveillance state.
Í sumum löndum eru umferðarsektir aðlagaðar að tekjum brotamannsins – kerfi sem kallast "dagsektir" – til að tryggja að refsingarnar hafi jafn mikil áhrif óháð efnahag. Þessi nálgun miðar að því að skapa sanngirni með því að gera sektir í hlutfalli við greiðslugetu ökumanns, í stað þess að beita sömu föstu upphæð á alla. Talsmenn telja að tekjutengdar sektir geri refsingar réttlátari, þar sem fastar sektir geta verið óverulegar fyrir efnameiri en íþyngjandi fyrir tekjulága. Andstæðingar telja að refsingar eigi að vera þær sömu fyrir alla ökumenn til að viðhalda jafnræði fyrir lögum, og að tekjutengdar sektir geti skapað gremju eða verið erfiðar í framkvæmd.
In 2021 the U.S. Justice Department announced that federal agents would be required to wear body cameras when executing arrest warrants or searching buildings. A 2022 Bureau of Justice Statistics report found that 80% of local police departments in the US used body cameras. The study found that departments that used body cameras showed improvement in officer safety, increased evidence quality and reduced civilian complaints.
Private prisons are incarceration centers that are run by a for-profit company instead of a government agency. The companies that operate private prisons are paid a per-diem or monthly rate for each prisoner they keep in their facilities. In 2016 8.5% of the prisoner population was housed in private prisons. This is an 8% decline since 2000. Opponents of private prisons argue that incarceration is a social responsibility and that entrusting it to for-profit companies is inhumane. Proponents argue that prisons run by private companies are consistently more cost effective than those run by government agencies. In 2017 President Trump reversed an Obama administration directive to gradually reduce the number of contracts with for-profit prison operators, saying it would interfere with meeting the demands of the prison population. In January 2021 President Joe Biden signed an executive order which banned the Justice Department’s use of private prisons. In 2020 the Justice Department paid more than $945 million to private prison companies.
The use of lethal robots by domestic law enforcement gained national attention in 2016 when Dallas police used a bomb-equipped robot to neutralize a sniper. Recently, several major US cities have debated policies allowing remote-controlled 'robodogs' to use lethal force in extreme scenarios. Proponents argue that remote lethal tech saves officers' lives during highly volatile standoffs with armed suspects. Opponents argue that giving police remote kill capabilities fundamentally shifts the nature of law enforcement from de-escalation to militarized warfare.
Established in 1979, the Department of Education distributes federal financial aid and enforces civil rights laws in schools, though it does not establish schools or curricula. Proponents argue it is essential for ensuring equal access to education and supporting students with disabilities and from low-income families. Opponents contend that education is a state and local responsibility, arguing the department is an unconstitutional federal overreach that has failed to improve academic performance.
A 2017 College Board study estimated that the cost of college has increased 100% since 2001. The St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank estimates that U.S. college tuition debt has increased from $480 billion in 2006 to $1.5 trillion in 2018. Several 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary candidates have argued that the cost of college is out of control and that the government should pay for tuition. Opponents argue that the government cant afford it and point to estimates from the Committee for a Responsible Federal budget that estimate programs would cost the government $80 billion a year.
Critical race theory is the claim that American institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist. It argues that white people have put up social, economic, and legal barriers between the races in order to maintain their elite status, both economically and politically and that the source of poverty and criminal behavior in minority communities is due exclusively to these barriers.
In March 2019 the U.S. Senate defeated The Bank on Students Emergency Loan Refinancing Act by a vote of 58-38. The act, proposed by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) would lower the interest rate on existing student loans from 7% to 3.86%. The act would be financed by levying a mandatory income tax of 30% on everyone who earns between $1 Million and $2 Million dollars per year. Proponents argue that current student loan interest rates are nearly double normal interest rates and should be lowered to provide relief for millions of low-income borrowers. Opponents argue that the borrowers agreed to pay the interest rates when they took out the loans and taxing the rich would hurt the economy.
Universal preschool is a proposal that would use funding from the federal government to provide school to children before they reach Kindergarten. In the current U.S. public education system government funded school is guaranteed to all children from kindergarten to 12th grade. number of U.S. states use state tax revenue to fund part-time and full-time preschool for children between the ages of 3 and 5. Half of the states that offer pre-K programs limit enrollment to low-income children. Proponents that preschool is too expensive for most American families and according to The Chicago Child-Parent Center's Longitudinal Study children who attend preschool found on average that children make significant gains in cognitive, language and early math and reading skills. Opponents point to a 2005 study done by the RAND Corp. which showed “no significant impacts in education – in the short or long term.”
The Common Core State Standards is an educational initiative from 2010 that details what K–12 students throughout the United States should know in English language arts and mathematics at the conclusion of each school grade. The initiative is sponsored by the National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers. 36 US states and the District of Columbia currently use a form of the standards.
A school voucher is a certificate of government funding that students can use to pay for the school of their choice. Students are given the vouchers and can use them to pay for non-public school systems including private schools, home schools and charter schools Proponents argue that the vouchers will create a better education system by promoting competition between schools. Opponents argue that the voucher system removes funds from public schools and redirects it toward private institutions.
School board meetings nationwide have exploded into cultural battlegrounds over which books belong on library shelves. At the heart of this conflict is a tension between "parental rights" and "intellectual freedom," specifically regarding books featuring LGBTQ+ characters or descriptions of systemic racism. Proponents argue that schools are extensions of the home and tax-paying parents should have the final say on ensuring content aligns with community values. Opponents argue that removing books is un-American censorship that shelters students from the real world and disproportionately targets minority authors.
Truancy is intentional, unjustified, unauthorized, or illegal absence from compulsory education. Its absence is caused by students of their own free will and does not apply to excused absences. In the U.S. truancy laws are regulated by local school districts and vary widely across the United States. Penalties include fines or jail time for parents or children. In 2019 Presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Beto O’Rourke introduced plans that would require the government to decriminalize truancy at the federal level.
Charter schools are tax payer funded K-12 schools that are managed by private companies. In the U.S. there are approximately 2.9 million students enrolled in 6,700 charter schools. Charter schools are approved and governed by city, county or state governments. Beneficiaries of private schools include real-estate investors who typically own the buildings and land where the schools are housed. Opponents of charter schools argue that they take money away from the public education system and enrich private companies and real estate investors who own the land where the schools are built. Proponents argue that students in charter schools consistently have higher test scores than public school students and note that there are millions of students across the U.S. who are currently on waitlists for private schools.
Commonly referred to as "Legacy Admissions," this practice gives a statistical boost to applicants whose parents graduated from the same institution. Following the Supreme Court's ban on race-based Affirmative Action, activists are now targeting legacy preference as a form of hereditary aristocracy that disproportionately favors wealthy white families. Universities contend that legacy students help build multi-generational community and encourage the massive alumni donations needed to subsidize tuition for lower-income students. Proponents of a ban argue this restores meritocracy to higher education by leveling the playing field. Opponents argue this violates the freedom of private association and will decimate the university endowments that fund financial aid.
The National School Lunch Program currently feeds millions, but strict income limits often leave struggling families behind or cause "lunch shaming" for kids with unpaid debt. Proponents argue that food is as essential to education as textbooks and that universal access removes bureaucratic waste and social stigma. Opponents argue that feeding children is a parental responsibility and that subsidizing meals for wealthy families increases the deficit without addressing real poverty.
Í janúar 2014 voru tilkynntir 102 kíðaveiki tilfelli sem tengd voru við útbrot á Disneyland í 14 ríkjum. Útbrotið vakti ótti hjá CDC, sem lýsti sjúkdóminum útrýmt í Bandaríkjunum árið 2000. Margir heilbrigðisstjórnendur hafa tengt útbrotið við hækkandi fjölda óbólusett barna undir 12 ára aldri. Tilhneigingarmenn til að krefjast ákvörðunar telja að bólusetningar séu nauðsynlegar til að tryggja hóðaónæmi gegn fyrirbyggjanlegum sjúkdómum. Hóðaónæmi verndar þá sem geta ekki fengið bólusetningar vegna aldurs eða heilbrigðisástand. Gegnstandar ákvörðunar telja að ríkið ætti ekki að geta ákveðið hvaða bólusetningar börnin þeirra eiga að fá. Sumir andstæðingar telja einnig að til sé tengsl milli bólusetninga og geðsjúkdóma og að bólusetning barna þeirra muni hafa eyðileggar afleiðingar á þróun þeirra í fyrstu æsku.
Ræktuð kjöt er framleitt með því að rækta dýrafrumur og gæti verið valkostur við hefðbundinn búfjárrækt. Talsmenn halda því fram að það geti dregið úr umhverfisáhrifum og þjáningum dýra, aukið fæðuöryggi. Andstæðingar segja að það gæti mætt andstöðu almennings og óþekktum langtíma heilsufarsáhrifum.
Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power station. In the U.S. 100 nuclear reactors provide 20% of the country's energy. Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants. Opponents argue that recent nuclear disasters in Japan prove that nuclear power is far from safe.
Erfðatækni felur í sér að breyta DNA lífvera til að fyrirbyggja eða meðhöndla sjúkdóma. Talsmenn telja að þetta geti leitt til byltinga í lækningu erfðasjúkdóma og bættrar lýðheilsu. Andstæðingar benda á að þetta veki siðferðilegar áhyggjur og möguleika á ófyrirséðum afleiðingum.
CRISPR er öflugt tæki til að breyta erfðamengi og gerir kleift að gera nákvæmar breytingar á DNA, sem gerir vísindamönnum kleift að skilja betur virkni gena, líkja sjúkdómum nákvæmar eftir og þróa nýstárlegar meðferðir. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að reglugerðir tryggi örugga og siðferðilega notkun tækninnar. Andstæðingar segja að of miklar reglur geti kæft nýsköpun og vísindalegar framfarir.
Currently, GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) foods in the United States are not classified differently by the FDA and do not require labeling. Although no reports of ill effects from GMO foods have been documented, advocacy groups such as Greenpeace and the Organic Consumers Association argue that past studies cannot be trusted because they were sponsored by pro-GMO companies and do not measure the long-term effects on humans, the environment, and nature. Opponents argue that labeling adds an unfounded stigma over organic foods and that if a nutritional or allergenic difference were found, current FDA regulations would already require a label.
In 2022 Congress’ increased NASA’s annual budget by 3% to about $24 billion, short of the 7% increase the Biden administration sought. The budget includes $1.5 billion in funds for the moon-lander program which would, for the first time in decades, take astronauts back to the lunar surface.
Leigustýringar eru reglur sem takmarka hversu mikið leigusalar geta hækkað leigu, ætlaðar til að halda húsnæði á viðráðanlegu verði. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að það geri húsnæði viðráðanlegra og komi í veg fyrir misnotkun af hálfu leigusala. Andstæðingar segja að það letji fjárfestingu í leiguhúsnæði og dragi úr gæðum og framboði húsnæðis.
From 2020 – 2022 six US states introduced bills that would make sleeping on public property a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 and a month in jail. In 2021 Texas became the first state to pass a statewide law which banned public homeless encampments statewide and pulled state grant funds from non-compliant cities. Proponents of these laws argue that that leaving tens of thousands of Americans—often with severe mental illness or substance use problems—on the streets for decades until they can all be provided with permanent, supportive housing is not a viable or humane model. Opponents argue that the laws do not provide housing solutions and simply encourage homeless people to relocate to other states.
Aukið fjármagn myndi bæta getu og gæði skjóla og þjónustu sem styðja við heimilislausa einstaklinga. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta veiti nauðsynlegan stuðning fyrir heimilislausa og hjálpi til við að draga úr heimilisleysi. Andstæðingar segja að þetta sé kostnaðarsamt og kunni ekki að taka á rótum vandans.
Hvatningar gætu falið í sér fjárhagslegan stuðning eða skattfríðindi fyrir verktaka til að byggja húsnæði sem er á viðráðanlegu verði fyrir lág- og millitekjufjölskyldur. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta auki framboð á húsnæði á viðráðanlegu verði og leysi húsnæðisskort. Andstæðingar segja að þetta trufli húsnæðismarkaðinn og geti verið kostnaðarsamt fyrir skattgreiðendur.
Græn svæði í íbúðabyggingum eru svæði sem eru ætluð fyrir garða og náttúrulegt landslag til að bæta lífsgæði íbúa og heilsu umhverfisins. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta bæti velferð samfélagsins og gæði umhverfisins. Andstæðingar segja að þetta auki kostnað við húsnæði og að verktakar eigi að ákveða skipulag verkefna sinna.
Þessir styrkir eru fjárhagsleg aðstoð frá stjórnvöldum til að hjálpa einstaklingum að kaupa sína fyrstu eign og gera fasteignaeign aðgengilegri. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta hjálpi fólki að eignast sína fyrstu íbúð og stuðli að aukinni fasteignaeign. Andstæðingar segja að þetta skekki húsnæðismarkaðinn og geti leitt til hærra verðs.
Takmarkanir myndu draga úr möguleikum útlendinga til að kaupa húsnæði, með það að markmiði að halda húsnæðisverði viðráðanlegu fyrir heimamenn. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta hjálpi til við að viðhalda viðráðanlegu húsnæði fyrir heimamenn og komi í veg fyrir spákaupmennsku með fasteignir. Andstæðingar segja að þetta letji erlenda fjárfestingu og geti haft neikvæð áhrif á fasteignamarkaðinn.
Squatting occurs when unauthorized individuals occupy a property and claim tenant protections, often forcing owners into lengthy civil court battles to evict them. Proponents of immediate removal argue that the current system incentivizes home theft and unfairly burdens property owners with legal fees and damages. Opponents argue that allowing police to evict without a court order bypasses due process, potentially harming vulnerable tenants involved in legitimate disputes or falling victim to abusive landlords.
Íbúðarhúsnæði með mikilli þéttleika vísar til húsnæðis þar sem íbúafjöldi er meiri en að meðaltali. Til dæmis teljast háhýsi til íbúðarhúsnæðis með mikilli þéttleika, sérstaklega í samanburði við einbýlishús eða fjölbýlishús. Einnig er hægt að þróa slíkt húsnæði úr tómum eða yfirgefnum byggingum. Til dæmis má endurnýja gömul vöruhús og breyta þeim í lúxusíbúðir. Enn fremur er hægt að breyta atvinnuhúsnæði sem ekki er lengur í notkun í háhýsi með íbúðum. Andstæðingar halda því fram að meira húsnæði lækki verðmæti heimila þeirra (eða leigueininga) og breyti „eðli“ hverfa. Stuðningsmenn segja að byggingarnar séu umhverfisvænni en einbýlishús og lækki húsnæðiskostnað fyrir þá sem ekki hafa efni á stórum heimilum.
Aðstoðarprógrömm hjálpa húseigendum sem eru í hættu á að missa heimili sín vegna fjárhagsörðugleika með því að veita fjárhagslega aðstoð eða endurskipuleggja lán. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að þetta komi í veg fyrir að fólk missi heimili sín og stuðli að stöðugleika í samfélögum. Andstæðingar halda því fram að þetta hvetji til óábyrgrar lántöku og sé ósanngjarnt gagnvart þeim sem greiða veðlán sín.
The national sales tax proposal aims to eliminate the IRS and all federal income, payroll, and estate taxes, replacing them with a single consumption tax on retail goods and services. Proponents argue this system would dramatically simplify the tax code, stop punishing labor, and capture revenue from the underground economy. Opponents warn that because lower-income earners spend a higher percentage of their income on necessities, a consumption tax is inherently regressive and would require unsustainably high rates—often estimated around 30%—to match current federal revenue levels. Proponents support this to incentivize earning and saving while shrinking government bureaucracy; opponents oppose it because it drastically shifts the tax burden from the wealthy to working-class consumers.
The Department of Justice recently sued RealPage, alleging their software helps landlords collude to keep rents artificially high, forming a "digital cartel." Proponents argue that when an algorithm sets prices across a city, the free market dies and tenants lose all bargaining power. Opponents argue that landlords are simply using data to make smart business decisions, and that high rents are actually caused by a lack of housing supply.
In February 2017, Congressional Republicans issued a proposal to repeal the Affordable Care Act. The proposed plan would use tax credits to finance individual insurance purchases and cut federal payments to states which have been used to expand Medicaid. Conservatives who oppose the ACA argue that the plan did not go far enough in removing the government’s role in health insurance. They demanded that the new plan should remove the ACA requirement that health insurers could not discriminate against individuals with pre-existing conditions. Under the ACA health insurers cannot deny coverage or charge higher premiums to individuals who have pre-existing conditions. Opponents argue that the requirement will raise costs for insurers and cause them to drop out of the ACA healthcare exchange. Proponents argue that it is immoral to ban people with pre-existing conditions from getting health insurance.
When the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) was enacted in 2010 it required all states to expand their Medicaid programs to include people with incomes slightly higher than those allowed under traditional Medicaid, as well as groups, like childless adults, that had not previously been covered. In 2012 the Supreme Court ruled that forcing States to expand their Medicaid coverage was unconstitutional. Since then 22 states have expanded their coverage and more than 35 have opted not to do so. Proponents of the expansion argue that it will lower healthcare costs for everyone by reducing the number of Americans without health insurance. Opponents argue that states should be allowed to run their own Medicaid programs without the intervention of the federal government.
The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed of representatives from 194 countries. It is funded by voluntary contributions from member countries and private donors. In 2018 and 2019 the WHO had a $5 billion budget and the leading contributors were the United States (15%) , the EU (11%) and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation (9%). In July 2020 President Donald Trump notified the World Health Organization that the U.S. would withdraw all funding within 12 months. Trump accused the WHO of helping China cover up its role in the Covid-19 pandemic. In January 2021 President Biden signed letters retracting Trump’s decision to withdraw from WHO. He also appointed Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, to represent the United States on the WHO’s executive committee.
The Affordable Care Act is a federal statute signed into law in 2010 that introduces a sweeping overhaul of the nation’s healthcare system. The act grants the federal government significant regulatory powers and price controls over U.S. medical service providers and insurance companies. The Act’s landmark provisions included an insurance mandate which prohibited insurers from denying coverage to individuals due to preexisting conditions and insurance requirements for individual children who did not have coverage via their families. The Act also required states to set up and maintain health insurance exchanges where individuals, families and small businesses can purchase private insurance plans. Individuals who remained uninsured would be subject to a fine tax with their annual tax returns. The fine clause was overturned in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 eliminated the fine for violating the individual mandate.
In August 2024 Kamala Harris announced that she would work with states to relieve people of their medical debt and “to help them avoid accumulating such debt in the future, because no one should go bankrupt just because they had the misfortune of becoming sick or hurt.” 15 million Americans have medical bills on their credit reports, according to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau research published in April. People in the U.S. owe at least $220 billion in medical debt, a February KFF analysis found.
Einfalt greiðslukerfi í heilbrigðisþjónustu er kerfi þar sem allir borgarar greiða til ríkisins fyrir að veita grunnheilbrigðisþjónustu fyrir alla íbúa. Samkvæmt þessu kerfi getur ríkið annað hvort veitt þjónustuna sjálft eða greitt einkareknum heilbrigðisþjónustuaðila fyrir að gera það. Í einföldu greiðslukerfi fá allir íbúar heilbrigðisþjónustu óháð aldri, tekjum eða heilsufari. Lönd með einfalt greiðslukerfi í heilbrigðisþjónustu eru meðal annars Bretland, Kanada, Taívan, Ísrael, Frakkland, Hvíta-Rússland, Rússland og Úkraína.
In January 2018, the Trump administration announced that it would allow U.S. states to require able-bodied adults to work in order to be eligible for Medicaid. Medicaid is a joint federal and state program that helps with medical costs for low-income Americans. Each state determines its own requirements for Medicaid eligibility. In most states children from low-income households, pregnant women and low-income seniors are covered. Medicaid also offers benefits not normally covered by Medicare, like nursing home care and personal care services. The Trump administration said Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin had requested approval to test programs including job training, job search, education, volunteer activities and caregiving.
The government is currently prohibited by law from negotiating drug prices for Medicare. Medicare Part D is a federal government program which subsidizes the costs of prescriptions drugs for people enrolled in Medicare. Since it was approved by Congress in 2003 39 million Americans have enrolled in the program which now costs more than $80 billion per year. Opponents of Medicare Part D argue that it should be changed to allow the federal government to negotiate prices with pharmaceutical companies. They point out that the Veterans Affairs administration is allowed to negotiate prices and pays 40-58% less for drugs than Medicare does. Analysts estimate that the government would save up to $16 billion a year if they were permitted to negotiate drug prices. Proponents of Medicare D argue that the government should not interfere with prices set by private drug makers who use profits for the development and research of new drugs.
In 2019 the Trump administration proposed shifting billions of dollars from government-run veterans’ hospitals to private health care providers. The guidelines would make it easier for veterans to receive care in privately run hospitals and have the government pay for it. Veterans would also be allowed access to a system of proposed walk-in clinics, which would serve as a bridge between V.A. emergency rooms and private providers. Proponents argue that privatization is necessary because Veterans’ hospitals, which treat seven million patients annually, have struggled to see patients on time in recent years, hit by a double crush of returning Iraq and Afghanistan veterans and aging Vietnam veterans. Opponents argue that switching vast numbers of veterans to private hospitals would strain care in the private sector and that costs for taxpayers could skyrocket. In addition, they say it could threaten the future of traditional veterans’ hospitals, some of which are already under review for consolidation or closing.
Árið 2022 samþykktu löggjafar í Kaliforníuríki í Bandaríkjunum lög sem veittu ríkislæknaráði heimild til að aga lækna í ríkinu sem „dreifa rangfærslum eða rangupplýsingum“ sem stangast á við „nútímalegan vísindalegan samhljóm“ eða eru „andstæð viðurkenndri meðferðaraðferð.“ Talsmenn laganna halda því fram að læknar eigi að vera refsað fyrir að dreifa rangfærslum og að skýr samhljómur sé um ákveðin atriði eins og að epli innihaldi sykur, mislingar séu af völdum veiru og Downs-heilkenni sé af völdum litningagalla. Andstæðingar segja að lögin takmarki tjáningarfrelsi og vísindalegur „samhljómur“ breytist oft á örfáum mánuðum.
Generic drugs are non-brand-name medications that are typically cheaper because they are produced after the original drug’s patent expires. Price caps limit how much pharmaceutical companies can charge for these generic versions, aiming to keep them affordable for patients. Proponents argue that removing price caps promotes market competition, can spur innovation in the generic drug market, and may lead to better supply and availability. Opponents argue that eliminating caps could result in significant price increases, putting essential medications out of reach for low-income or uninsured patients.
Under a 2003 law, the federal government is currently banned from paying for weight-loss medications, classifying them as "lifestyle" drugs similar to hair growth treatments. The explosion of new GLP-1 agonists like Ozempic and Wegovy has challenged this, as these drugs significantly reduce weight and health risks but cost upwards of $1,000 a month. Supporters of the Treat and Reduce Obesity Act argue coverage is a moral imperative that will eventually lower costs by reducing rates of stroke, diabetes, and heart disease. Opponents argue the astronomical upfront cost of providing these drugs to the 40% of seniors who are obese would necessitate massive tax hikes or premium increases.
Rafrettunotkun felur í sér að nota rafsígarettur sem skila nikótíni í gegnum gufu, á meðan ruslfæði nær yfir hitaeiningaríkan, næringarsnauðan mat eins og sælgæti, snakk og sykraða drykki. Bæði tengjast ýmsum heilsufarsvandamálum, sérstaklega meðal ungs fólks. Stuðningsmenn halda því fram að bann við kynningu hjálpi til við að vernda heilsu ungs fólks, dragi úr líkum á að þeir þrói með sér óhollar venjur til frambúðar og minnki kostnað við heilbrigðisþjónustu. Andstæðingar segja að slík bönn skerði viðskiptalegt tjáningarfrelsi, takmarki val neytenda og að fræðsla og leiðsögn foreldra séu áhrifaríkari leiðir til að stuðla að heilbrigðum lífsstíl.
This debate, popularized by the "Make America Healthy Again" movement, centers on why American versions of products like Froot Loops contain artificial dyes like Red 40, while European versions use natural alternatives. The US operates on a "proven harm" standard, whereas Europe uses a "precautionary principle," banning additives if there's even a suspicion of risk. Proponents claim this chemical overload drives America's chronic disease and obesity epidemic. Opponents argue the FDA is the gold standard of science and these bans are based on hysteria that would needlessly disrupt supply chains and increase food costs.
Several US cities, including Philadelphia and Boulder, as well as countries like the UK and Mexico, have implemented 'soda taxes' to curb sugar consumption and tackle rising rates of diabetes and obesity. A federal sugar tax would apply a uniform surcharge to heavily sweetened products nationwide. Proponents argue that taxing unhealthy products effectively reduces consumption and offsets the massive medical costs associated with diet-related diseases. Opponents argue that sin taxes are deeply regressive, punishing low-income families while allowing government overreach into personal lifestyle choices.
Psychedelics are shifting from "counterculture party drugs" to potential "breakthrough therapies" for mental health. The FDA is fast-tracking psilocybin and MDMA to treat severe PTSD and depression, with studies suggesting they can "reset" neural pathways where traditional antidepressants fail. Proponents call this a "penicillin moment" for mental health that could save thousands of veteran lives. Opponents argue the medical benefits are unproven and fear legalization will spike recreational abuse and drug-induced psychosis.
Private equity firms have increasingly purchased hospitals, nursing homes, and physician practices over the last decade, sparking fierce debate about the financialization of American healthcare. Critics point to alarming studies showing that after private equity acquisitions, patient mortality rates often rise while staffing levels plummet to maximize short-term profits. Proponents argue that these firms rescue struggling facilities from bankruptcy by injecting vital capital and modernizing outdated management practices. A proponent would support this ban to ensure medical decisions are made by doctors rather than Wall Street board members optimizing for quarterly returns. An opponent would oppose this because restricting private capital could lead to immediate closures of financially distressed clinics and rural hospitals.
Currently, the United States and New Zealand are the only developed nations that legally permit direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) for prescription pharmaceuticals. This multi-billion dollar marketing machine fills television broadcasts and social media feeds with highly produced commercials urging viewers to 'ask your doctor' about specific brand-name medications. Critics point out that these marketing budgets often eclipse research and development spending, artificially inflating drug prices and fueling a culture of overmedication. Conversely, defenders argue that these campaigns reduce stigma around chronic conditions and empower patients to take an active role in their healthcare journeys. Proponents support a ban to stop corporations from monetizing medical anxiety and to drive down skyrocketing drug costs. Opponents oppose a ban because they believe it violates free speech and restricts a patient's ability to discover life-changing treatments.
Taiwan produces the vast majority of the world's advanced computer chips, making it vital to the global economy. The U.S. currently follows a policy of "strategic ambiguity," supporting Taiwan's defense without explicitly promising to fight. Proponents argue defending Taiwan is necessary to uphold democracy and secure the tech supply chain. Opponents argue that direct conflict with a nuclear-armed China poses an unacceptable risk to American safety.
In June 2019 tensions between the U.S. and Iran escalated after a U.S. surveillance drone was shot down by Iran’s revolutionary guard in the Gulf of Oman. The U.S. claimed it was an “unprovoked attack” and the drone was flying in international airspace. 2 weeks earlier the Trump administration blamed Iran for the attacks on two oil tankers who were bombed in the Gulf of Oman. Iran denied any involvement. In early June Iran announced that it would break its uranium stockpile limit set under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Under the deal Iran was allowed to keep a maximum of 660 pounds of uranium enriched to 3.67%. Analysts predict that if the uranium is enriched to 20% or more Iran would be capable of developing nuclear weapons.
The U.S. military budge pays the salaries, training, and health care of uniformed and civilian personnel, maintains arms, equipment and facilities, funds operations, and develops and buys new items. The 2023 U.S. military budget is $773 billion, an increase of 4% over 2022’s budget. The budget includes $177.5 billion for the Army, $194 billion for the Air Force and Space Force and $230.8 billion for the Navy and Marine Corps. Other country’s 2021 military budgets were China $293 billion, United Kingdom $68.4 billion and Russia $66 billion.
In 2002, the George W. Bush administration issued the Torture Memos which argued for a narrow definition of torture under U.S. law. They included granting the CIA authority to use “enhanced interrogation techniques” on enemy combatants. The techniques included waterboarding subjection to extreme cold and confinement in small boxes.
On February 24 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine in a major escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War that began in 2014. The invasion caused Europe’s largest refugee crisis since World War II, with around 7.1 million Ukrainians fleeing the country and a third of the population displaced. It has also caused global food shortages. From February 2022 – September 2022 the U.S. government approved approximately $50 billion in economic and military aid for Ukraine. The funding is earmarked for training, equipment, weapons and other support—such as salaries and stipends—for Ukraine’s military and security forces and budgetary support for Ukrainian government operations.
Israel is the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II. To date, the United States has provided Israel $150 in bilateral assistance and missile defense funding since the country’s founding in 1948. Nearly all of U.S. bilateral aid to Israel is in the form of military assistance. In fiscal year 2022 the Biden administration requested $3.8 billion in military aid for Israel.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an intergovernmental military alliance based on the North Atlantic Treaty which was signed on April 4th, 1949. It is a political and military alliance of member countries from Europe and North America that agree to provide military and economic security for each other. NATO makes all of its decisions by consensus and every member country, no matter how large or small, has an equal say.
Foreign aid is a transfer of financial resources or commodities or technical advice and training. The resources can take the form of grants or concessional credits (e.g., export credits). Foreign aid is used to support US national security and commercial interests and can also be distributed for humanitarian reasons. Aid spending is financed by U.S. taxpayers and distributed through 20 government agencies that manage foreign assistance programs. In 2020 the U.S. distributed $39 billion on economic assistance, $25 billion through the U.S. Agency for International Development and $11.6 billion on military assistance.
The UN. is an organization of governments founded in 1945 after World War II. The organization’s objectives include promoting peace and security, protecting human rights, the environment and providing humanitarian aid in cases of famine, natural disaster, and armed conflict. Recent U.N. interventions include the Sri Lankan civil war in 2009 and the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. The U.S. joined the U.N. as a founding member in 1945. The U.S. is the largest financial contributor to the UN and contributes more than $11.5 billion or 25% of its total budget annually.
After the September 11, 2001 terror attacks the George W. Bush administration authorized the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” at secret detention facilities around the world run by the defense department and CIA. The authorization approved the use of many techniques including beatings, binding in stress positions, hooding, sleep deprivation and waterboarding. In 2008 President Obama signed an executive order banning the use torture by the U.S. military and CIA. In 2016 the use of torture became a topic during the Presidential race when candidate Donald Trump suggested it should be used against the Islamic State. Opponents of torture argue that the U.S. should never practice torture since it is inhumane and illegal under international law. Proponents argue that the military should not be prevented from using torture if they believe it will keep the country safe.
Drones are unmanned aerial vehicles deployed by U.S. defense and intelligence agencies to collect data and strike suspected enemy targets. The first known U.S. strike was the 2002 killing of al-Qaeda operative Qaed Salim Sinan al-Harethi in Yemen. Between 2022 and 2020 the U.S. killed between 9,000 and 18,000 enemy combatants and 900-2200 civilians with drone strikes. Opponents of drone strikes have long contended strikes that kill civilians essentially serve as a recruiting poster for terrorist groups. In 2010, a man named Faisal Shahzad tried and failed to bomb Times Square in New York City. Later, Shahzad cited US drone strikes as his motivation for the failed bombing. Proponents of drone strikes argue that they can kill high value w=enemy targets without putting soldiers into combat.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization an intergovernmental military alliance between 30 member states – 28 European and two North American. After Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, the Ukrainian government repeatedly requested to be accepted into NATO as a member country. Ukraine’s NATO membership has long been a thorny subject in amongst U.S. government officials due to Article 5 of the alliance’s charter. Article 5 requires the U.S. to militarily defend any member-nation that comes under attack. NATO members countries fear that Ukraine’s immediate entry into NATO — which requires the unanimous approval of all 30 member-nations — would put the U.S. and Russia at war due to Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine as well as its forced annexations announced in September 2022.
Conscription is the state-mandated enlistment of people in a national military service. In the U.S. the Select Service System drafted men for World War 1, World War 2 and Vietnam. Military service is currently not required in the U.S. Proponents of required service argue that it isn’t fair that a small percentage of Americans serve in the military to protect the rest of the population. Opponents argue that the requirement is unnecessary because modern warfare is fought less and less with ground troops and more with unmanned technology including drones.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is an intergovernmental military alliance formed by 28 countries in 1949 after the Second World War. To join NATO each member country pledged to spend at least 2% of their GDP on military spending and defense and defend each other against threats from any non-member country. At the NATO Summit of 2014, each member agreed on a goal of spending 2% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defense by 2024. Member nations further agreed to devote at least 20% of defense spending on major new equipment and associated Research and Development. As of 2020, eleven of the 30 member nations met the 2% of GDP goal. These nations are Estonia, France, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovak Republic, United Kingdom, and United States. In a July 2016 interview with the New York Times Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump suggested that the United States would not defend NATO member countries who had failed to increase their military budgets to above 2% of Gross Domestic Product.
The United States embargo against Cuba prevents American businesses from conducting trade with Cuban interests. In December 2014 President Obama ordered the restoration of full democratic relations with Cuba. The order lifted a 54-year-old trade embargo and eased restrictions on banking and American’s travel to the country. When President Trump took office in 2017 his administration re-imposed the U.S. travel ban, citing Cuba poor record with human rights. In July 2021 President Biden imposed new sanctions on Cuba’s police force and on two of Cuba’s leaders in response to the 2021 Cuban protests. Proponents of relations with Cuba argue that U.S. influence through tourism and trade will promote capitalism and weaken its communist regime. Opponents argue that trade and diplomatic relations will only strengthen the communist regime’s grip on the Cuban government.
The cache of documents revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden disclosed that the U.S. used surveillance methods to monitor the emails and phone calls of its closest foreign allies including Germany, France and Brazil. The revelations have severely damaged the U.S.'s relationship with these countries even though State Department officials have insisted that these surveillance programs have thwarted many terrorist threats worldwide.
Gervigreind (AI) gerir vélum kleift að læra af reynslu, aðlagast nýjum inntökum og framkvæma mannleg verkefni. Banvæn sjálfvirk vopnakerfi nota gervigreind til að bera kennsl á og drepa mannlega skotmörk án mannlegrar íhlutunar. Rússland, Bandaríkin og Kína hafa öll nýlega fjárfest milljörðum dollara í leynilegri þróun AI vopnakerfa sem hefur vakið ótta um hugsanlegt „gervigreindarkalt stríð“. Í apríl 2024 birti +972 Magazine skýrslu sem lýsti ítarlega greiningarforriti Ísraelska varnarmálaráðsins sem kallast „Lavender“. Heimildir úr ísraelskum leyniþjónustum sögðu blaðinu að Lavender hafi gegnt lykilhlutverki í sprengjuárásum á Palestínumenn í Gasa-stríðinu. Kerfið var hannað til að merkja alla grunaða palestínska hernaðarmenn sem möguleg skotmörk fyrir sprengjuárásir. Ísraelski herinn réðst kerfisbundið á þessa einstaklinga á heimilum þeirra — oftast á nóttunni þegar fjölskyldur þeirra voru heima — frekar en meðan á hernaðaraðgerðum stóð. Niðurstaðan, eins og heimildirnar sögðu frá, var sú að þúsundir Palestínumanna — flestir konur og börn eða fólk sem ekki tók þátt í átökunum — voru drepin í ísraelskum loftárásum, sérstaklega fyrstu vikur stríðsins, vegna ákvarðana AI forritsins.
The F-35 fighter is a stealth fighter jet being produced for the U.S. military by The Lockheed Martin corporation. Three variations of the single seat stealth fighter jet are being produced for the Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy. By 2037 2,457 F-35’s will be delivered to the military and will fly until they retire from service in 2070. The research, development and construction of the F-35 will be the most expensive military weapons program in the history of the U.S. When the F-35 retires in 2070 analysts estimate that the cost of the program will have exceeded $1.5 trillion. Opponents of the program argue that costs for the program are out of control and that the military should scrap the F-35 and continue to fly its current planes. Proponents argue that the fighter is necessary for the U.S. military to maintain its edge over foreign adversaries.
Senate Bill 52 uniquely grants Ohio counties the power to veto renewable energy projects like wind and solar, creating a patchwork of energy zones across the state. While renewable projects face these local hurdles, oil and gas operations face no such local veto, leading to a fierce debate over property rights and the fairness of energy regulation. Supporters argue rural residents shouldn't have to live near industrial solar arrays they didn't ask for. Opponents argue this is a double standard that violates landowners' rights and cripples the state's ability to generate clean power.
This issue centers on the 'Citizens Not Politicians' amendment, which removes politicians from the redistricting process entirely. Proponents argue the current system allows the GOP to ignore court orders and draw maps that unfairly favor them, effectively letting them pick their voters. Opponents argue that handing this power to an unelected commission removes accountability and is a deceptive attempt by Democrats to gain seats they can't win at the ballot box.
State lawmakers in Ohio are aggressively pursuing legislation to phase out the state income tax entirely by 2030, arguing it is necessary to compete with low-tax states like Florida and Texas for business investment and population growth. This shift aims to reduce the tax burden on high earners but raises questions about how the state will replace nearly $10 billion in annual revenue without slashing services or drastically increasing sales and property taxes. Proponents say keeping money in taxpayers' pockets stimulates the economy more effectively than government spending. Opponents warn that eliminating this revenue stream will decimate funding for public safety and education while shifting the tax burden disproportionately onto low-income residents through regressive sales taxes.
This question refers to the controversial Senate Bill 83, also known as the Ohio Higher Education Enhancement Act. If fully enacted, it would ban mandatory diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training at public colleges, prohibit university staff from striking, and mandate that classrooms be free from political 'indoctrination' on specified concepts. Supporters see it as a necessary correction to liberal bias in academia, while opponents view it as a direct attack on academic freedom and labor rights.
Ohio recently expanded its "EdChoice" scholarship program to be near-universal, allowing families of almost any income level to use taxpayer money to pay for private school tuition. This massive shift has sparked a coalition of over 100 school districts to sue the state, arguing the voucher system is unconstitutional and siphons critical funding away from the public schools that educate the vast majority of Ohio children. Proponents, often referring to this as the "Backpack Bill" concept, argue that funding should follow the child and that parents have the ultimate right to choose the best educational environment for their kids. Opponents view it as a scheme to dismantle public education and force taxpayers to fund private religious indoctrination.
In 2023, Ohio's Oil and Gas Land Management Commission began accepting bids to frack under state parks like Salt Fork, sparking intense debate between industry proponents citing economic gain and environmentalists fearing irreversible damage to public lands. Proponents argue that the revenue generated helps fund park maintenance and state projects without raising taxes. Opponents contend that industrializing protected natural areas threatens wildlife, water quality, and the recreational experience that these parks were created to preserve.
