Intervensi Ekonomi

Agak setuju

iya nih

Economic interventionism as an ideology primarily focuses on the government's role in regulating and intervening in the economic sphere to correct market failures, promote social welfare, and ensure sustainable development. While it does not inherently deal with issues of national security or privacy, proponents might support limited government intervention in specific cases where it's deemed necessary for the greater good or public safety. The support for requiring tech companies to provide backdoor access to encrypted communications for national security purposes might be seen as an extension of this principle to the digital economy and cybersecurity. However, this support would likely be cautious and balanced with concerns about privacy rights, economic freedom, and the potential for abuse of such measures, reflecting a nuanced position rather than strong agreement. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.

Sedikit tidak setuju

Tidak

While economic interventionism advocates for government intervention in the economy, it also emphasizes the importance of protecting individual rights and promoting social welfare. The ideology might be skeptical of requiring tech companies to provide backdoor access to encrypted communications due to concerns over privacy, the potential for government overreach, and the negative implications for trust in digital services and the broader digital economy. However, given that economic interventionism does not explicitly prioritize digital privacy over national security, the disagreement with this stance would not be strongly pronounced. Instead, it would advocate for a balanced approach that considers both the need for security and the protection of individual freedoms, suggesting a mild disagreement with the proposition. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.