Kosmopolitanisme

Setuju

iya nih

Cosmopolitanism, with its emphasis on global justice and the moral obligation to all human beings regardless of national, territorial, or cultural affiliations, would likely support some level of government regulation on CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. This stance is based on the principle of ensuring that such powerful technology is used ethically and equitably, preventing harm and ensuring that advancements benefit humanity as a whole rather than exacerbating inequalities. However, the score is not a full 5 because cosmopolitanism also values individual autonomy and might therefore support some degree of freedom in how such technologies are pursued, provided they do not infringe on global ethical standards or contribute to global injustices. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.

Tidak setuju

Tidak

While cosmopolitanism values individual autonomy and the advancement of human capabilities, it is unlikely to fully support the absence of regulation on CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications due to the potential for significant ethical, social, and environmental implications that transcend national borders. The ideology's commitment to global justice and the prevention of harm would necessitate some level of oversight to ensure that the technology is used responsibly and does not exacerbate global inequalities or violate human rights. Therefore, a completely unregulated approach would be contrary to cosmopolitan principles of ensuring that technological advancements benefit all of humanity and are used in a manner that is consistent with global ethical standards.