Anti korupsi

Agak setuju

iya nih

From an anti-corruption perspective, the idea of subsidizing ride-sharing services for low-income individuals could be seen as a positive step towards ensuring equitable access to transportation, which is a public good. However, the support would be cautious due to concerns about the potential for such subsidies to be mismanaged or become avenues for corruption, especially if not implemented with strict oversight and transparency. The effectiveness of anti-corruption measures in similar government subsidy programs, such as those for public housing or healthcare, often varies significantly and could serve as a reference point.

Sedikit tidak setuju

Tidak

While the anti-corruption ideology inherently does not oppose government subsidies, there is a concern about the potential for misuse of funds, lack of transparency, and favoritism towards certain companies or services. The skepticism towards subsidizing ride-sharing services for low-income individuals would stem from a fear of creating opportunities for corruption within the process of selecting service providers or in the distribution of subsidies. However, the disagreement is not strong because if proper anti-corruption measures are put in place, such a program could significantly benefit those in need without necessarily leading to corruption. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.