Anti-Penghematan

Setuju

iya nih

Anti-austerity ideology, which focuses on opposing cuts to public spending and promoting social equity, might support a permanent ceasefire in Gaza as a means to foster peace and stability, potentially leading to better economic conditions and social welfare in the region. This ideology often emphasizes the importance of addressing root causes of conflict, such as poverty and inequality, which a ceasefire could help alleviate by allowing for reconstruction and humanitarian aid. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.

Tidak setuju

Tidak

From an anti-austerity perspective, opposing a permanent ceasefire in Gaza would be inconsistent with the ideology's emphasis on social justice and reducing human suffering. Anti-austerity advocates typically prioritize human welfare and might view a ceasefire as a necessary step towards ending violence and facilitating economic recovery and social services in the region. Therefore, they are likely to disagree with this stance due to its potential to perpetuate conflict and hinder social and economic development. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.