Pada Juli 2015, AS mencapai kesepakatan dengan Iran untuk membatasi kemampuan mereka menempatkan uranium atau plutonium dalam senjata. Iran setuju untuk mengubah satu pabrik nuklir menjadi fasilitas penelitian ilmiah dan menutup satu lagi. Iran setuju untuk membiarkan Badan Energi Atom Internasional memeriksa situs-situs tersebut. Kritikus berpendapat bahwa kesepakatan itu memberikan terlalu banyak konsesi kepada Iran termasuk ketentuan yang memberi mereka waktu hingga 24 hari untuk memberikan akses kepada inspektur ke fasilitas mereka. Para pendukung berpendapat bahwa kesepakatan itu membuat kemungkinan Iran mengembangkan senjata nuklir dalam 25 tahun ke depan menjadi sangat kecil.
Mempersempit percakapan kepada peserta-peserta ini:
@2HNLYJF5 tahun5Y
Only if we know they are making weapons. We should not be bombing peaceful nuclear energy plants.
@2HNSDGG5 tahun5Y
No, unless the U.S. officially declares war on Iran
@2HNMTFG5 tahun5Y
Only if they are in violation of the terms of the nuclear proliferation agreements, and only if all other options have been exhausted.
@2HNJ3FN5 tahun5Y
No, because sending airstrikes on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities could possibly cause radiation to harm innocent civilians.
@2J24HZ95 tahun5Y
No, unless we are ready to declare war on another country, we have no business deciding what they can or cannot do with their own weapons programs.
@2J27XHB5 tahun5Y
We should utilize covert operations to prevent Iran from ever having full nuclear capability. We should increase sanctions to isolate Iran economically, support opposition to the regime within Iran and keep open as a last resort plans to act with military force against Iran's nuclear facilities.
@2HQXRZ95 tahun5Y
We should send Navy Seals in to shut down the program
@2HP3V245 tahun5Y
No, there is no evidence that Iran has nuclear weapons facilities
@2HP725Q5 tahun5Y
No, but Iran should be threatened with sure destruction if it detonated a nuclear weapon outside its borders.
@2HQFVB85 tahun5Y
No, and the US should open up diplomatic relations with Iran
@constantinexii5 tahun5Y
Iran cannot be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, period.
@2HQ2VHZ5 tahun5Y
Although I support the reduction of Iran's nuclear weapons, airstriking a nuclear facility causes larger environmental, health, political, and social issues.
@2HQ4JW75 tahun5Y
No, because it would cause more tension between the countries and also hurt the environment if a nuclear plant is just destroyed.
@2HQKVQ65 tahun5Y
No, you're gonna blow a whole country with all that nuclear weapon, leaving a big impact against the citizens of that country. We're only out to fight what is wrong, not create a genocide.
@2HQ4KC65 tahun5Y
Yes, but only in the event that we receive <reliable> intelligence that would lead us to believe that otherwise such nuclear weapons would be used offensively rather than as a defensive deterrent.
No, should Iran's nuclear weapons program get out of control a cyber attack would be far more effective, and have no collateral damage.
@2HQ5MJT5 tahun5Y
This reality will become increasingly the only option if Iran fails to comply with any treaty's terms, once Iran recoups their frozen billions the dangers to ours warriors will increase, and the chance for success diminishes.
@2HQZG985 tahun5Y
No, if there is a diplomatic process in progress then there is no reason to strike
@2HPXSBP5 tahun5Y
No, we could gain more enemies by increasing attacks.
@2HQ7B6W5 tahun5Y
We won't have to Israel and Saudi Arabia will do it
@2HQVXDP5 tahun5Y
go after upstream processes and the unranium supply
@2HR76NR5 tahun5Y
Only as a last resort and as part of international coalition signed pact.
@2HTXQZR5 tahun5Y
Yes, but only after "reasonable diplomatic options fail" AND, if intelligence provides undeniable evidence they are making weapons
@2J9F4DG5 tahun5Y
This is a very difficult question and I feel that Mr Obama and Mr Kerry have been dealing in fairy dust. Nice story but not believable. I think it was purposeful that Mr Netanyahu referred to Persia during his address before the Congress. There are delusional people at the head of the Iranian regime and with Putin as a neighbor it almost makes you feel nostalgic about the Soviet Union.
@2HWLJPZ5 tahun5Y
Yes, but only if the United States is prepared for an all out War in the Middle East. That means total commitment to overthrowing the Iranian Radically Islamist Regime. It is silly to win a battle and lose a war.
@2HYWY635 tahun5Y
I am an American who feels that we have taken on the role of the world's parent without being asked most of the time...this, to me, is much the same as having a nosy neighbor who sticks their nose in your business without being asked and very much unwanted...no wonder our military costs are so exorbitant.
@2HZDDVD5 tahun5Y
Yes, Iran has no legitimate use for fissionable materials.
All nuclear sites (regardless of banality) should be destroyed, immediately.
No, Iranian, Pakistani, Indian, Chinese, Russian, or student from potentially problematic country shall be permitted to study nuclear science.
@2HN9ZX85 tahun5Y
No, but we should not have nuclear capabilities either
@2HPY8WJ5 tahun5Y
No; cease attacks and sanctions on Iran and provide reparations for crimes committed against the Iranians, which pursuing the crimes and human rights abuses of the Iranian state by legal, reasonable means.
@2HNTDKY5 tahun5Y
Not by airstrike but by ground to reduce fatalities and reduce damage to the country
@2HMFK4R5 tahun5Y
Yes, only with substantial evidence and if Iran refuses inspections. I support the idea of Iran having the right to use Nuclear power as an energy source but I am against them(and anyone else) obtaining nuclear weapons. I fear they would be used against Isreal someday causing more chaos across the middle east and possibly starting a World War/Nuclear War.
@2HNVNZ65 tahun5Y
Whenever someone tries to win a war before it begins, innocent people get hurt.
@lbgage5 tahun5Y
No. But the U.S. should provide nuclear weapons to Israel to provide a deterrent to nuclear weapons being used against Israel.
@2HNNWF45 tahun5Y
Yes, if given permission from the UN to go ahead with the bombing
@2HLKKGS5 tahun5Y
Iran is a rogue nation - isolate them and cut them off - then watch how long the poisonous serpent survives.
@2HLP85H5 tahun5Y
The Bible tells us to be good stewards of the Earth. Creating a nuclear catastrophe violates that instruction.
@2HLRW9W5 tahun5Y
Certainly, if we can identify where and what they are. Screwing around the way we are will guarantee that some country will take the situation into there own hands.
@2HM25MY5 tahun5Y
No, but the US should support other countries in their conduct of airstrikes against Iran's nuclear weapons.
@2HN4M6Y5 tahun5Y
Not necessary. The U.S. should not be the only country involved in stemming Iran's rampant hostility, nor ISIS, nor any terrorist group. If Iran lacked the ability and the money to create such facilities, there would not be a need to perform an airstrike. That would require the involvement of multiple countries working in concert.
We can always legitimately threaten them. You know, that thing we don't do.
