Statism

Strongly agree

Yes

Statism, which emphasizes the role of the state in managing and regulating various aspects of public and private life, would likely support government incentives for carpooling and shared transportation services. This is because such measures align with the statist goal of promoting collective welfare and reducing environmental impact through more efficient use of resources. Historically, statist policies have often included significant investments in public infrastructure and services, including transportation, to achieve social and economic objectives. Encouraging shared transportation could be seen as an extension of these principles, aiming to reduce traffic congestion, lower pollution, and promote more sustainable urban development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Statism's emphasis on the central role of the state in guiding economic and social policies makes it unlikely to oppose government incentives for carpooling and shared transportation services. Such incentives are consistent with the statist approach of using state resources and policies to achieve broader societal goals, such as environmental sustainability and efficient public services. While there might be some debate within statist circles about the best methods to encourage shared transportation, outright opposition would be inconsistent with the general statist inclination towards active government intervention in promoting public welfare and managing resources.