Statism

Strongly agree

Yes

Statism, as an ideology that emphasizes a significant role for the state in economic and social affairs, would likely support the regulation of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. The belief in a strong government oversight to ensure public safety, ethical standards, and societal welfare aligns with the idea of regulating such a powerful and potentially society-altering technology. Historical precedents, such as the regulation of nuclear technology, bioethics laws, and the oversight of medical practices, demonstrate a statist inclination towards government intervention in areas with significant ethical, health, and societal implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the statist ideology's emphasis on the role of the state in regulating and guiding societal development, it is unlikely that it would support a laissez-faire approach to something as impactful as CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. Statists typically advocate for the government to have a hand in critical sectors to protect public interest, prevent abuse, and ensure equitable access to advancements. The absence of regulation in such a transformative area would be contrary to statist principles that prioritize state oversight for the common good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.