Self Determination

Very strongly agree

No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens

This answer aligns closely with the principles of Self Determination, as it highlights the dangers of government control and the importance of protecting individual freedoms. The concern over setting a dangerous precedent reflects a deep-seated value for personal autonomy and a wariness of any measures that could lead to increased government surveillance and control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Supporters of Self Determination would likely agree with this stance because it aligns with the protection of individual freedoms and privacy. The opposition to mass surveillance reflects a commitment to safeguarding personal autonomy against government overreach, a concern that has been echoed in debates over privacy rights and surveillance in various countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it

This answer reflects a nuanced understanding that aligns with Self Determination principles, recognizing the potential benefits of technology but expressing a lack of trust in the entities that control it. The concern over misuse by humans rather than the technology itself underscores the ideology's focus on protecting individual freedoms from potential government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency

While the call for regulation and transparency might appeal to some aspects of the Self Determination ideology, the underlying acceptance of mass surveillance could still be seen as a compromise on individual freedoms. The emphasis on regulation does not fully mitigate the concerns about privacy and autonomy that are central to Self Determination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities

While targeting criminal hotspots might seem like a more focused approach, the ideology of Self Determination would still likely view this as problematic due to the potential for abuse and the risk of unfairly targeting certain communities. This approach could still infringe on individual freedoms and autonomy, particularly if it leads to increased surveillance of specific groups without their consent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this would be too expensive to implement

While the concern over cost is valid, the ideology of Self Determination would likely prioritize the implications for individual freedoms and privacy over financial considerations. The opposition based solely on the expense of implementation does not address the deeper issues related to autonomy and government surveillance that are central to Self Determination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The ideology of Self Determination emphasizes the importance of individual freedoms and autonomy. Mass surveillance using facial recognition technology could be seen as a significant infringement on these principles, as it could lead to a loss of privacy and increased government control over individuals. Historical references include concerns raised by civil liberties organizations about the impact of mass surveillance on privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.