Right

Agree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

This answer aligns with a key principle on the 'Right': the importance of supporting allies, especially in the context of mutual defense against common threats. The perspective here emphasizes the pragmatic need to ensure allies are well-equipped, even if they are accused of human rights violations, prioritizing geopolitical strategy over human rights concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many on the 'Right' prioritize national security and the benefits of international alliances, including arms sales, as a means to maintain global stability and counter mutual threats. They may argue that such sales are necessary for strategic reasons, even if the purchasing country has a questionable human rights record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The 'Right' ideology often emphasizes national sovereignty, security interests, and the importance of maintaining strategic alliances, which can sometimes override concerns about human rights violations in other countries. While there might be some support for restrictions, it's often balanced against these other considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While there is a segment of the 'Right' that advocates for non-interventionism, the broader ideology typically supports the use of military aid as a tool of foreign policy and strategic influence. A blanket ban on all military aid to foreign countries would be seen as limiting a country's ability to project power and influence globally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

This position is likely to be strongly opposed by those on the 'Right', as it prioritizes human rights over strategic and national security interests. The 'Right' often views such bans as overly restrictive and potentially harmful to national and global security interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.