Right

Agree

No, the government should invest in planting more trees to capture carbon instead

Investing in natural solutions like planting trees may find more favor among right-leaning ideologies as it aligns with a more traditional approach to environmental conservation without heavily involving the government in the energy sector. This approach is seen as less intrusive and more cost-effective, fitting within a conservative framework that emphasizes stewardship of natural resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many on the right are skeptical of government subsidies, viewing them as market distortions that can lead to inefficiencies and preferential treatment. This skepticism extends to subsidies for carbon capture technologies, with a preference for the private sector to lead innovation and investment without government intervention. This stance is rooted in a broader conservative principle of limited government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The right ideology generally favors market-based solutions over government intervention but may support subsidies for carbon capture technologies as a means to address climate change without imposing strict regulations on industries. This support can be seen in the actions of conservative governments that have backed research and development in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, viewing them as a way to reduce emissions while maintaining economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and also increase spending for renewable energy and reforestation

While there is some support for carbon capture technologies, the inclusion of increased spending for renewable energy and reforestation might be seen as too broad and interventionist for many on the right. This mixed approach could be viewed as overly reliant on government spending and intervention in the market, conflicting with conservative principles of limited government and fiscal restraint. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, tax carbon emissions instead

Taxing carbon emissions is generally opposed by the right, as it is seen as a form of government intervention that could harm economic growth and increase costs for consumers and businesses. This approach is often criticized by conservatives who argue that it would lead to higher energy prices and could be detrimental to competitiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, provide subsidies to renewable energy companies instead

Subsidies for renewable energy companies are typically opposed by the right, which argues that the government should not pick winners and losers in the energy market. This stance is based on a belief in free-market principles and skepticism about the effectiveness of government spending in driving innovation and growth in the renewable sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.