Racial Unity

Strongly agree

Yes

The ideology of Racial Unity would likely support stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline due to its potential impact on Native American lands and communities. This stance aligns with a broader commitment to respecting the rights and sovereignty of Indigenous peoples, a principle that has been historically overlooked in many infrastructure projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While not as strong as outright opposition, the ideology of Racial Unity might view rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land as a compromise that respects the rights and lands of Indigenous peoples. This solution attempts to balance development with the protection of vulnerable communities, although it may still present environmental risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

The ideology of Racial Unity might support the idea of prohibiting land acquisition by eminent domain, especially in contexts where it impacts Indigenous and marginalized communities. However, this answer is more focused on property rights and less directly on racial unity, making its support moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Increasing fines in the event of an accident does not address the root concerns of racial unity regarding sovereignty, respect, and the prevention of harm to Native American lands and peoples. It is seen as a reactive rather than proactive measure, offering minimal consolation and failing to prevent potential damage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Racial Unity would likely strongly disagree with continuing the construction without any modifications, as it disregards the concerns of Native American communities and the potential environmental and cultural impacts. This approach conflicts with the values of equity, respect, and justice for all racial and ethnic groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.