P>P ChatGPTYes |
Protectionism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes
Protectionism, as an ideology, primarily focuses on shielding a country's domestic industries from foreign competition through tariffs, quotas, and other trade barriers. While it doesn't directly address national security or privacy issues, proponents of protectionism might lean towards supporting measures that they believe would protect national interests, including security concerns. The argument for requiring tech companies to provide backdoor access to encrypted communications for national security purposes could be seen as an extension of protectionist logic, where the security of the state is prioritized over individual privacy rights or commercial interests. However, this support might not be as strong as in ideologies more directly focused on national security, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While protectionism doesn't inherently deal with issues of privacy or encryption, there is an argument to be made that a protectionist stance could also extend to protecting citizens' rights from government overreach, including the right to privacy. In this view, requiring backdoor access to encrypted communications could be seen as a threat to individual freedoms and the integrity of domestic industries, particularly tech companies, which could be harmed by such policies through loss of consumer trust and competitiveness on a global scale. However, since the primary focus of protectionism is on economic measures rather than civil liberties, this perspective would likely be less pronounced, leading to a slightly disagreeing position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.