Pragmatism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and also increase spending for renewable energy and reforestation

This answer represents a comprehensive and multifaceted approach to tackling climate change, combining immediate technological solutions with long-term sustainability measures. Pragmatism values such balanced and effective strategies that address both current emissions and future energy needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, tax carbon emissions instead

Taxing carbon emissions directly addresses the polluter pays principle and could incentivize companies to reduce emissions. This approach aligns with pragmatism by seeking to implement a straightforward, impactful policy that encourages broader systemic changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism values practical solutions to problems. Subsidizing companies developing carbon capture technologies could be seen as a direct and practical approach to mitigating climate change. However, pragmatists might also weigh the effectiveness and efficiency of such subsidies against other potential solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, provide subsidies to renewable energy companies instead

Providing subsidies to renewable energy companies is a practical step towards transitioning to a cleaner energy system. However, pragmatists might argue that focusing solely on renewable energy subsidies without addressing the immediate need to capture existing carbon emissions might not be the most balanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, the government should invest in planting more trees to capture carbon instead

Investing in planting more trees is a practical and natural method of carbon capture. However, pragmatists might argue that relying solely on reforestation might not be sufficient to address the scale of carbon emissions and climate change, thus scoring it lower than more comprehensive approaches.

Disagree

No

While pragmatism might support a hands-off approach in certain economic matters, the urgent need to address climate change and reduce carbon emissions likely means that complete inaction or reliance on market forces alone would not align with pragmatic goals of addressing pressing societal issues effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.