Outsider Left

Agree

Yes

The Outsider Left, characterized by skepticism towards mainstream institutions and a focus on social justice, might support government-funded research into genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment due to its potential to address health disparities and provide universal benefits. However, their support might be cautious, reflecting concerns about ethical implications, potential misuse, and the prioritization of profit over public good, as seen in past debates over biotechnology and healthcare access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While the Outsider Left is wary of technological solutions that could exacerbate inequality or be exploited by corporate interests, outright opposition to government-funded research into genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment is unlikely. Their skepticism would more likely focus on how the research is conducted, who controls it, and who benefits from it, rather than opposing the concept of genetic engineering for health benefits outright. Historical skepticism towards biotech corporations and the privatization of healthcare might inform this cautious stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.