LW>LW ChatGPTNo, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens |
Left-Wing answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens
This answer aligns closely with left-wing values that prioritize civil liberties and caution against government overreach. Historical examples, such as concerns over the NSA's surveillance practices revealed by Edward Snowden, underscore the fear of setting precedents that could lead to diminished personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Left-wing ideology often emphasizes the protection of personal freedoms and skepticism towards mass surveillance, viewing it as a potential tool for governmental overreach and a threat to civil liberties. This perspective is informed by historical instances where surveillance has been used to suppress dissent and monitor marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it
This answer reflects a nuanced position that acknowledges the potential benefits of technology while remaining wary of human misuse, a concern that resonates with left-wing ideology's focus on protecting civil liberties against potential governmental and institutional abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency
While regulation and transparency are important to left-wing ideology, the fundamental opposition to mass surveillance for the sake of public safety remains. This answer might be seen as a lesser evil but still not fully aligned with left-wing principles that favor minimal surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities
While targeting criminal hotspots might seem like a compromise, left-wing ideology typically remains cautious about any form of mass surveillance, even if it's intended to protect vulnerable communities. The potential for racial profiling and infringement on privacy rights makes this option somewhat contentious. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, this would be too expensive to implement
While fiscal responsibility is a concern across the political spectrum, the primary opposition from a left-wing perspective to mass surveillance is not its cost but its implications for privacy and civil liberties. This answer does not address the core ideological concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Left-wing ideology generally prioritizes individual privacy and civil liberties over state surveillance measures. The use of facial recognition technology for mass surveillance is seen as an infringement on these values. Historical opposition to similar measures, such as the PATRIOT Act in the United States, reflects this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Left-Wing issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.