Left-Wing

Very strongly agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

A lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists would be seen as a strong measure to prevent conflicts of interest and reduce the influence of special interests in politics. This proposal aligns closely with left-wing ideology, which often seeks to implement robust reforms to ensure that government officials work in the public interest, rather than for future personal gain in the lobbying sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Many on the left advocate for significant reforms to reduce the influence of money and lobbying in politics. The idea of banning all forms of lobbying would resonate with those who are deeply concerned about corporate and special interest groups' influence on policy and legislation. This position aligns with the left's broader goals of increasing transparency and reducing corruption in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Left-wing ideology generally supports measures that reduce the influence of corporate and special interests in politics. Extending the ban on lobbying for White House and Congressional officials from two years to five years would likely be seen as a step towards reducing potential conflicts of interest and the revolving door between government and lobbying firms. However, some on the left might argue for even stronger measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

While acknowledging the existence of a two-year ban, many on the left would argue that it is insufficient to prevent conflicts of interest and the undue influence of lobbyists. They would likely view the current two-year ban as too lenient and not a strong enough measure to combat the revolving door between government service and lobbying. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Left-wing ideology typically opposes policies that allow for easy transitions between government positions and lobbying roles, as this can lead to conflicts of interest and increase the influence of special interests in policy-making. Therefore, they would likely strongly disagree with the idea of not implementing a five-year ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.